Thursday, 31 May 2012
- Re: ACTION-89: Draft cfp for localization world to PC list (MultilingualWeb-PC)
- ACTION 15: target-pointer
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: ACTION-89: Draft cfp for localization world to PC list (MultilingualWeb-PC)
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 31 May 2012 2 p.m. UTC
- ACTION-89: Draft cfp for localization world to PC list (MultilingualWeb-PC)
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Tuesday, 29 May 2012
- Reminder: MLW-LT call 31 May 2 p.m. UTC
- [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
Friday, 25 May 2012
Thursday, 24 May 2012
- [all] requirements draft published!
- AW: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-7 (XPath Version): Sue of Xpath 2.0 [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
- [all] Working Group meeting, Thu 2012-05-24 14:00 UTC
- RE: [ACTION-85] Provide example of cache data category
- Re: [ACTION-85] Provide example of cache data category
- [all] Requirements document, wiki etc.
Friday, 18 May 2012
- RE: [All] Call for consensus (Re: finished edits to requirements document)
- ISSUE-11 (Delete genre, purpose and register data category proposals) and ACTION-87 (Summarize discussion about categories)
- [all] tracker and public-multilingualweb-lt mailing list
- [all] MLW-LT Call time: every week 2 p.m. UTC
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- [All] Call for consensus (Re: finished edits to requirements document)
- finished edits to requirements document
Thursday, 17 May 2012
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-7 (XPath Version): Sue of Xpath 2.0 [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
- AUTO: CN=Phil Ritchie/O=VISTATEC is out of the office. (returning 21/05/2012)
- RE: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- [ACTION-85] Provide example of cache data category
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-22: Provenance and agents [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
- ISSUE-2 (Fwd: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type)
- RE: [all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft)
- Re: [all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- [all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft)
- RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- RE: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- AW: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- RE: [ACTION-86] Put cache data category back to requirements
- AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- RE: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
- [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
- [all] Agenda for WG meeting 14.00 UTC 17 May 2012
- [ACTION-86] Put cache data category back to requirements
- RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
Monday, 14 May 2012
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- [all] Working Group call time (please check again)
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
- RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
Friday, 11 May 2012
- Re: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
- Re: NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
- Re: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
- [ISSUE-15] target-pointer
- Re: NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
Thursday, 10 May 2012
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-19 (html-legacy-content): HTML legacy content: how to represent the metadata? [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-18 (dropping-rdfa): Dropping RDFa as a requirement?
- [all] handling of actions and issues - please check for missing issues before next call
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-17 (elements-or-attributes): Elements or attributes [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-16 (parameter-for-rules): Parameter for rules [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-15 (target-pointer): Definition of target pointer and why it is needed
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-14 (process-trigger): Process trigger data category [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-13 (cache): Cache data category needed and how? [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- RE: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
- RE: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
- RE: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
- Re: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
- RE: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- Re: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
- NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT call Thursday 2012-05-10 (ATTENTION: New call time + suggestion for general call time change)
- Re: [ACTION-81] consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
Monday, 7 May 2012
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: An additional data category
- RE: targetPointer Requirement update
- RE: targetPointer Requirement update
- [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- RE: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT call Thursday 2012-05-10 (ATTENTION: New call time + suggestion for general call time change)
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- AW: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- AUTO: CN=Phil Ritchie/O=VISTATEC is out of the office. (returning 10/05/2012)
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-12 (Segmentation Markup): Create a (Sentence) Segmentation Markup System compatible with the proposed Unicode segmentation characters [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- Re: An additional data category
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-11: Delete genre, purpose and register data category proposals [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-10 (lang-locale): Language versus locale [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Language vs. locale
- An additional data category
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: [ACTION-81] consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- [ACTION-81] consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent
- RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Apologies (Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list)
- [all] AGENDA MLW-LT call Thursday 2012-05-10 (ATTENTION: New call time + suggestion for general call time change)
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- [ACTION-82] Add an implementation commitment column to the table and ask people to populate it
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- RE: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
Monday, 7 May 2012
- RE: targetPointer Requirement update
- RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
Sunday, 6 May 2012
Friday, 4 May 2012
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: XPath Version
- RE: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: XPath Version
- [All] Minutes MLW-LT call 2012-05-04 (DRAFT)
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list
- targetPointer Requirement update
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- [ACTION-87] Produce initial table which takes data cats and ranks by difficulty based on current allocations and rank by interest of WG members
Thursday, 3 May 2012
- Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list
- Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list
- Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list
- [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list
- [all] Working Group Meeting details and agenda - May 4, 10am GMT DST
- Re: XPath Version
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
- Re: [ACTION-78]Consider consolidation of localeSpecificContent and droprule
- Re: idValue requirement updated
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-9 (id value rules): id granularity and maintenance requirements and rules
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-8 (id value rules): id granularity and maintenance requirements and rules
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- RE: idValue requirement updated
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- Re: idValue requirement updated
- Re: [issue 3] How to specify the entity type with RDFa ?
- Re: XPath Version
- RE: ACTION-74: Check ITS 1.0 future work is included in the req document
Tuesday, 1 May 2012
- Re: XPath Version
- ACTION-74: Check ITS 1.0 future work is included in the req document
- Re: XPath Version
- Re: XPath Version
- Re: idValue requirement updated
- Re: Missing requirment - content format/type
- Re: Missing requirment - content format/type
- RE: XPath Version
- RE: idValue requirement updated
- RE: XPath Version
- Re: idValue requirement updated
- Re: XPath Version
- RE: idValue requirement updated
- RE: Missing requirment - content format/type
- Re: idValue requirement updated
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !