- From: David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 01:33:38 +0100
- To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FA323E2.6090202@cs.tcd.ie>
Hi Tadej, To ease management of the data category requirements, I've collected these particular data categories under a heading, 'terminology': http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements#Terminology You can document you consolidated version there. For convenience, archive any data categories you remove in: http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements/Original_Requirements Regards, Dave On 26/04/2012 14:29, Tadej Stajner wrote: > On 4/26/2012 2:23 PM, David Lewis wrote: >> Dear all, >> I have four further suggestions for consolidating requirements that >> I'd like to discuss briefly on the call with the relevant people: >> >> Moritz, Des: I think there is potential to combine 'confidentiality' >> with 'contentLicensingTerms', with confidentiality being a specific >> value of contentLicensingTerms, whcih could perhaps be relaised using >> Creative Commons license classes >> >> DaveL, Moritz: Could localeSpecificContent be consolidated with >> dropRule, e.g. specifying the content should be drops for specific >> locales, for every translation, or for every translation except >> specified locales? >> >> DaveL, Pedro: I think we could consolidate author, revisionAgent and >> translationAgent, with a generic 'agent' bound to a process spec, >> aligning with work in the W3C Provenance Working Group, >> www.w3.org/2011/prov/ >> >> Pedro, Dabiel, Declan, Tadej: I think there may be opportunity to >> consolidate mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and >> textAnalyticsAnnotation. For instance is MT disambiguation really >> terminology support for MT? >> > > Yes, they all have a lot in common. The way I see it, textAnalytics > annotation is the common superclass of the other three, > mtDisambiguation seems to focus on difficult content, namedEntity on > named entities and term on terms. They all allow referring to an > ontology URI behind the fragment they are annotating - this property > is equivalent across all three, but there are specifics in each category. > > - what would qualify as difficult content under mtDisambiguation? > - is there anything MT-specific in mtDisambiguation? Or can we call it > simply "disambiguation"? > - mtDisambiguation-domainSelector is very similar in functionality to > term-terminologyResource, could we consolidate those? > - namedEntity-type can be seen as a special case of a > mtDisambiguation-semanticSelector; > > My recommendation would be to gather some common properties and pull > them in the textAnalyticsAnnotation superclass. > >> comments weclome, >> Dave >> >> >
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 00:33:58 UTC