[all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft)

Hi all,

thank you for your good feedback. I decided to postpone the publication. I
should have explained the W3C process here more clearly: if a WG is
proposing more than editorial edits (like deleting data categories from the
draft) after a call for consensus, we cannot publish - the W3C mgmt won't
allow this.

So here is the new plan: today I will
- add Moritz' figure

- leaving undecided data cats in and say in the draft: all data categories
are only proposals and not stable. Important is to get feedback along the
lines of
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements#Feedback
.

- move the end-to-end use cases, as Dave said (thanks for the reminder)

- make my edits, mentioned in the previous mail in this thread

- add a "status of the document section" (this is necessary for publication)


After Dave's Thursday night edits, I will make the HTML conversion and send
another call for consensus on Friday morning, if there is no request for
changes (except spelling etc.) by Tuesday, I will request publication which
should be done around Thursday - Friday - so at least we have a small
overlap with LREC :)
Best,

Felix


2012/5/16 Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>

> All,
>
> this is call for consensus for publishing the requirements document
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements
> as a first public working draft. For those of you who are new to the W3C
> process: we need a decision by the working group to publish the draft under
> the "TR" directory
> http://www.w3.org/TR/
>
> this evening (European time) I will do the following:
> - Implement issue-10 in the draft
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/10
> - generalize all comments like "ARLE: ..." to "working group comment: ..."
> - add a "status of the document" section at the top of the document
> - convert the document to HTML and send the so-called "transition request".
>
> Please reply to this call for consensus if you have any concerns about the
> publication. Of course the document still has issues. Note that the
> publication will be a *first* public working draft, so we will have plenty
> of opportunities to change things. Note also that publishing asap is
> helpful for getting wider feedback, e.g. next week at the LREC conference
> which some of us will attend. So if there are no very severe issues, I
> encourage you to agree with the publication.
>
> Please give any feedback in this thread by tonight 11 p.m. CEST.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Felix
>
> --
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow