- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:38:08 +0200
- To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czobF9+FWw4zXWLHvMBZ3haO+xeYo1n-vgw1+4uHSR+ZdA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave, the bottom line is that I need to freeze the document tonight, 11 p.m., or we won't be able to publish this before LREC. Some questions / comments below? 2012/5/16 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> > Hi Felix, > I had a quick scan last night. In general I think it looks good with the > proviso of: > 1) there are some ongoing actions with data category proposals from yves, > tadaj, myself and others circulating via the list that are not yet in the > document. But if they are still being discussed then we can leave them out > for this version. > You mean "leave the data categories out"? I would propose to have them in, since it can help to foster our discussions. > 2) should we remove the interested person names from the data category > table, and just record them on the separate assessment page. > Agree. > 3) you mention moving the end-to-end use case into section 2 - which would > improve the flow The text could do with some improvement to communicate the > use cases in a more accessible way, and to be more consistent with the > prior definitions. > Agree. > 4) There are several direct links to other documents in the text, should > these be put in as references? > Yes. > > If you can signal when you have done your changes, i can try and address > these on the wiki version say on thursday evening before the HTML > conversion. When do you need it frozen to do the HTML step? > Today 11 p.m., if we want to publish before LREC. Felix > > cheers, > Dave > > > > > On 16/05/2012 13:43, Moritz Hellwig wrote: > > Hi Felix,**** > > ** ** > > for the first draft, this looks fine too me too. **** > > ** ** > > I’ve attached a diagram of the proposed metadata to this message, as I > find it easier to get an overview over what’s been proposed. I plan to > extend it regularly when things change or more information becomes > available the metadata. I’d like to add the diagram to the requirements > page if nobody has any objections.**** > > > Cheers,**** > > Moritz**** > > ** ** > > *Von:* Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com <ysavourel@enlaso.com>] > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 13:44 > *An:* 'Felix Sasaki'; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > *Betreff:* RE: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as > first public working draft**** > > ** ** > > Hi Felix,**** > > ** ** > > The current wiki draft looks fine to me for a first draft.**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > -yves**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:20 PM > *To:* public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > *Subject:* [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first > public working draft**** > > ** ** > > All,**** > > ** ** > > this is call for consensus for publishing the requirements document **** > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements**** > > as a first public working draft. For those of you who are new to the W3C > process: we need a decision by the working group to publish the draft under > the "TR" directory**** > > http://www.w3.org/TR/**** > > ** ** > > this evening (European time) I will do the following:**** > > - Implement issue-10 in the draft **** > > https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/10**** > > - generalize all comments like "ARLE: ..." to "working group comment: ..." > **** > > - add a "status of the document" section at the top of the document**** > > - convert the document to HTML and send the so-called "transition request". > **** > > ** ** > > Please reply to this call for consensus if you have any concerns about the > publication. Of course the document still has issues. Note that the > publication will be a *first* public working draft, so we will have plenty > of opportunities to change things. Note also that publishing asap is > helpful for getting wider feedback, e.g. next week at the LREC conference > which some of us will attend. So if there are no very severe issues, I > encourage you to agree with the publication.**** > > ** ** > > Please give any feedback in this thread by tonight 11 p.m. CEST.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > Felix**** > > ** ** > > -- > Felix Sasaki**** > > DFKI / W3C Fellow**** > > ** ** > > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 14:38:52 UTC