W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2012

AW: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft

From: Moritz Hellwig <Moritz.Hellwig@cocomore.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:45:59 +0200
Message-ID: <A5F4BCC8EDECF74D97DBCEF820F7269FBC3748@cocont10.office.cocomore.com>
To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "Dave Lewis" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hello Felix,


currently trying to understand the W3C and its processes better, so I've got
a question: what's LREC?





Von: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 16:38
An: Dave Lewis
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as
first public working draft


Hi Dave,


the bottom line is that I need to freeze the document tonight, 11 p.m., or we
won't be able to publish this before LREC. Some questions / comments below?

2012/5/16 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>

Hi Felix,
I had a quick scan last night. In general I think it looks good with the
proviso of:
1) there are some ongoing actions with data category proposals from yves,
tadaj, myself and others circulating via the list that are not yet in the
document. But if they are still being discussed then we can leave them out
for this version.


You mean "leave the data categories out"? I would propose to have them in,
since it can help to foster our discussions.


	2) should we remove the interested person names from the data
category table, and just record them on the separate assessment page.




	3) you mention moving the end-to-end use case into section 2 - which
would improve the flow The text could do with some improvement to communicate
the use cases in a more accessible way, and to be more consistent with the
prior definitions.




	4) There are several direct links to other documents in the text,
should these be put in as references?




	If you can signal when you have done your changes, i can try and
address these on the wiki version say on thursday evening before the HTML
conversion. When do you need it frozen to do the HTML step?


Today 11 p.m., if we want to publish before LREC.





	On 16/05/2012 13:43, Moritz Hellwig wrote: 

	Hi Felix,


	for the first draft, this looks fine too me too. 


	I've attached a diagram of the proposed metadata to this message, as
I find it easier to get an overview over what's been proposed. I plan to
extend it regularly when things change or more information becomes available
the metadata. I'd like to add the diagram to the requirements page if nobody
has any objections.




	Von: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] 
	Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 13:44
	An: 'Felix Sasaki'; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
	Betreff: RE: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as
first public working draft


	Hi Felix,


	The current wiki draft looks fine to me for a first draft.






	From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
	Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:20 PM
	To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
	Subject: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as
first public working draft




	this is call for consensus for publishing the requirements document 


	as a first public working draft. For those of you who are new to the
W3C process: we need a decision by the working group to publish the draft
under the "TR" directory



	this evening (European time) I will do the following:

	- Implement issue-10 in the draft 


	- generalize all comments like "ARLE: ..." to "working group comment:

	- add a "status of the document" section at the top of the document

	- convert the document to HTML and send the so-called "transition


	Please reply to this call for consensus if you have any concerns
about the publication. Of course the document still has issues. Note that the
publication will be a *first* public working draft, so we will have plenty of
opportunities to change things. Note also that publishing asap is helpful for
getting wider feedback, e.g. next week at the LREC conference which some of
us will attend. So if there are no very severe issues, I encourage you to
agree with the publication.


	Please give any feedback in this thread by tonight 11 p.m. CEST.






	Felix Sasaki

	DFKI / W3C Fellow




Felix Sasaki

DFKI / W3C Fellow

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 14:46:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:44 UTC