TPAC 2014
ISSUE-78: What is the best order for the elements in the best practices template
ISSUE-77: We need to bring the comuri work into the best practices format agreed at the tpac f2f
dwbp-ACTION-127: Write description of data identification section
dwbp-ACTION-126: Put the topic of combining the comuri work with the best practices on the agenda for 14 nov's call
dwbp-ACTION-125: Review doc about dataset version and look up for standards about dataset version
dwbp-ACTION-124: Write description as intro to vocab section of bp doc
dwbp-ACTION-123: Write a description for the beginning of the metadata section
dwbp-ACTION-122: Wotk with sumit to write at least a description of the best practice(s) around data formats
dwbp-ACTION-121: Look at linked data bp at http://www.w3.org/tr/ld-bp/#vocabularies and to talk with mark h and antoine to see if the controlled vocab section fits with the data vocabs
dwbp-ACTION-120: Create an example about metadata description
ISSUE-76: What advice do we give about publishing metadata so that we identify the intended outcome without making assumptions that maybe false?
ISSUE-75: Whether it would be helpful to this wg if jeni's work at http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ were to be published as a tag finding
dwbp-ACTION-119: to review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/
dwbp-ACTION-118: Review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/
dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design
dwbp-ACTION-116: Develop into something that we can reuse and make more like a best practice
dwbp-ACTION-115: Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document
Our own meme
ISSUE-74: Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc
ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc?
dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72
ISSUE-72: Is data enrichment in scope for dwbp?
ISSUE-71: We have use cases for feedback but is it in scope given the 3 aximoatic criteria resolved at tpac
ISSUE-70: Should we include data enrichment in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
dwbp-ACTION-113: Check the scoping criteria against the deliverables/commitments in our charter
dwbp-ACTION-112: Research and report ways that technical best practices have been tested
Apologies for Todays Call
ISSUE-68: We should define "structured"
ISSUE-67: Should we include a best practice around which format to use? (csv, json, json-ld, xml, etc.)
ISSUE-66: We need more use cases to get the requirements to define the data usage vocabulary
ISSUE-65: How to carry forward the data quality issue - more use cases? available options? text only? machine readable dimensions?
ISSUE-64: Jeremy t's expression of concern over 'data must be complete' - not realistic. better to say where it isn't complete
ISSUE-63: If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else?
ISSUE-62: What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived
ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in
- Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in
dwbp-ACTION-111: Merge r-citable with the data usage requirements
dwbp-ACTION-110: Remove r-multiplerepresentations as a duplicate of r-formatmultiple
ISSUE-60: Does 4.1.9 accurately reflect the use cases? and can it be better summarised as data availability?
dwbp-ACTION-109: And annette to write a use case about real-time and bulk data
ISSUE-59: We should agree on a definition for "real time"
ISSUE-58: What do we mean with bulk 4.1.9 r-accessbulk
ISSUE-57: R-datalifecycleprivacy, r-sensitiveprivacy and r-sensitivesecurity and the topics they represent may or not be in scope for the working group
ISSUE-56: We need context and examples. do they go into the rec-track documents or into a separate note?
ISSUE-55: The word "granularity" can been many things. scope, city/state/country, data aggregation
ISSUE-54: The term "sla" is vague, undefined, and may not actually represent an agreement between the publisher and reuser
ISSUE-53: Whether sla is/can be thought of as part of the licence or whether it needs to be pulled out spearately?
ISSUE-52: Lauter to help us think about how to address our confusion of terms. (glossary?)
ISSUE-51: Phil to clarify the use of the word "provenance" any potential confusion it causes
ISSUE-50: Bernadette to help us find more use cases on the vocabulary itself (including creating a vocabulary)
ISSUE-49: Phil to either improve on the definition of "reference vocabulary", or point to existing definitions
ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists
dwbp-ACTION-108: Amend/expand r-granularitylevels to cover laufer's question about inheritance â??metadata for the data itself and for the dataset
dwbp-ACTION-107: Clarify rformatlocalize according to questions in the f2f discussion
dwbp-ACTION-106: Add a requirement for a suitable format (as per jenit's suggestion)
FW [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.1 Release
Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F?
- Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F?
Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org
IBM Launches Humanitarian Initiatives to Help Contain Ebola Outbreak in Africa
Time zones next week
dwbp-ACTION-105: Create wiki page seeking input on f2f meeting venue for brasil
dwbp-ACTION-104: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/index.php?title=rdf_and_json-ld_usecases
dwbp-ACTION-103: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios
dwbp-ACTION-102: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios
dwbp-ACTION-101: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios
dwbp-ACTION-100: Send deirdre's text to all of our attendees to tpac (incl guests) http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-dwbp-wg/2014oct/0080.html
Agenda for tomorrow
Ebola Open Data Jam
From this morning's meeting: new wiki page for second round of use cases...
dwbp-ACTION-99: Derive requirements from share-psi workshop, including the one about metadata federation from spain, cf action-32
dwbp-ACTION-98: Sent an email to tpac registered people about uc document
Agenda for Penultimate Call before TPAC!
Open Agenda for Vocabulary Call tomorrow...
TPAC Taxis
Invitation to Review Use-Cases & Requirements (W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group)
- Re: Invitation to Review Use-Cases & Requirements (W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group)
vocabulary call tomorrow?
Publication Request, DWBP UCR doc
Business angle on data on the Web
COMURI comments
Adding to UCR Doc
dwbp-ACTION-97: Send out invitation for feedback on published uc document
dwbp-ACTION-96: Set on the vocabulary call agenda of what we plan on delivering for tpac
dwbp-ACTION-95: Check zakim booing for tpac
ACTION-81: Reviewing COMURI document
Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014
UCR ready - please review before Friday
Information Update - Description has changed: Chicago Open Data Webinar USA Toll Free: 888-426-6840,,70360994# Participant Code: 70360994
Link to wiki page about Data Usage scenarios
dwbp-ACTION-94: Work with use case editors on finding a way to find use cases for uri persistence
dwbp-ACTION-93: Finish gs1 closed-data use case with phila
dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases
dwbp-ACTION-91: Suppress detail of bio2rdf use case and incldue link as laufer suggests
dwbp-ACTION-90: Create first draft of agenda for negotiations (time zones, conflicts with data shapes wg, etc)
Action-79 A review of COMURI
Notes and summary of today's Vocabulary call
UCR Forked
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-43 (Connections): Connect UCR with BP etc [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13
Re: ISSUE-10: Data usage meaning
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage
Agenda for tomorrow's call
dwbp-ISSUE-47 (Biometrics): Do we need the metrics from Bio2RDF? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
RE: dwbp-ACTION-89: Create a use case on the research community
Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time
Related to Issue-46
dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]