public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from October 2014 by date

Friday, 31 October 2014

TPAC 2014 Ig Ibert Bittencourt
ISSUE-78: What is the best order for the elements in the best practices template Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-77: We need to bring the comuri work into the best practices format agreed at the tpac f2f Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-127: Write description of data identification section Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-126: Put the topic of combining the comuri work with the best practices on the agenda for 14 nov's call Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-125: Review doc about dataset version and look up for standards about dataset version Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-124: Write description as intro to vocab section of bp doc Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-123: Write a description for the beginning of the metadata section Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-122: Wotk with sumit to write at least a description of the best practice(s) around data formats Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-121: Look at linked data bp at http://www.w3.org/tr/ld-bp/#vocabularies and to talk with mark h and antoine to see if the controlled vocab section fits with the data vocabs Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-120: Create an example about metadata description Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-76: What advice do we give about publishing metadata so that we identify the intended outcome without making assumptions that maybe false? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-75: Whether it would be helpful to this wg if jeni's work at http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ were to be published as a tag finding Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-119: to review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-118: Review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-116: Develop into something that we can reuse and make more like a best practice Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-115: Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Our own meme Ig Ibert Bittencourt
Our own meme Yaso
ISSUE-74: Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-72: Is data enrichment in scope for dwbp? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-71: We have use cases for feedback but is it in scope given the 3 aximoatic criteria resolved at tpac Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-70: Should we include data enrichment in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-113: Check the scoping criteria against the deliverables/commitments in our charter Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-112: Research and report ways that technical best practices have been tested Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Apologies for Todays Call Phil Archer
Re: Apologies for Todays Call Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Apologies for Todays Call Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in Christophe Guéret
Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in Augusto Herrmann
Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in Ghislain Atemezing
RE: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in Makx Dekkers
Re: ISSUE-63: If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else? Christophe Guéret
Re: ISSUE-62: What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived Christophe Guéret
Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in Christophe Guéret
ISSUE-68: We should define "structured" Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-67: Should we include a best practice around which format to use? (csv, json, json-ld, xml, etc.) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 30 October 2014

ISSUE-66: We need more use cases to get the requirements to define the data usage vocabulary Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-65: How to carry forward the data quality issue - more use cases? available options? text only? machine readable dimensions? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-64: Jeremy t's expression of concern over 'data must be complete' - not realistic. better to say where it isn't complete Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-63: If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-62: What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-111: Merge r-citable with the data usage requirements Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-110: Remove r-multiplerepresentations as a duplicate of r-formatmultiple Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-60: Does 4.1.9 accurately reflect the use cases? and can it be better summarised as data availability? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-109: And annette to write a use case about real-time and bulk data Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-59: We should agree on a definition for "real time" Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-58: What do we mean with bulk 4.1.9 r-accessbulk Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-57: R-datalifecycleprivacy, r-sensitiveprivacy and r-sensitivesecurity and the topics they represent may or not be in scope for the working group Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-56: We need context and examples. do they go into the rec-track documents or into a separate note? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-55: The word "granularity" can been many things. scope, city/state/country, data aggregation Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-54: The term "sla" is vague, undefined, and may not actually represent an agreement between the publisher and reuser Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-53: Whether sla is/can be thought of as part of the licence or whether it needs to be pulled out spearately? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-52: Lauter to help us think about how to address our confusion of terms. (glossary?) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-51: Phil to clarify the use of the word "provenance" any potential confusion it causes Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-50: Bernadette to help us find more use cases on the vocabulary itself (including creating a vocabulary) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-49: Phil to either improve on the definition of "reference vocabulary", or point to existing definitions Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Andrea Perego
dwbp-ACTION-108: Amend/expand r-granularitylevels to cover laufer's question about inheritance �??metadata for the data itself and for the dataset Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-107: Clarify rformatlocalize according to questions in the f2f discussion Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-106: Add a requirement for a suitable format (as per jenit's suggestion) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org Steven Adler
Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org Phil Archer
Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Eric Stephan
Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Steven Adler
Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Riccardo Albertoni
ACTION-105: Create wiki page seeking input on f2f meeting venue for brasil Caroline Burle
RE: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Makx Dekkers
Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Debattista, Jeremy

Wednesday, 29 October 2014

Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org Steven Adler
Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org Carlos Iglesias
FW [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.1 Release Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Bart van Leeuwen
Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? Antoine Isaac
Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org Steven Adler

Monday, 27 October 2014

IBM Launches Humanitarian Initiatives to Help Contain Ebola Outbreak in Africa Steven Adler

Friday, 24 October 2014

Time zones next week Phil Archer
Re: Table of Contents DWBP Antoine Isaac
Re: Table of Contents DWBP Christophe Guéret
Re: Table of Contents DWBP Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Christophe Guéret
Re: Table of Contents DWBP Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Re: Table of Contents DWBP Christophe Guéret
Re: Table of Contents DWBP Antoine Isaac
dwbp-ACTION-105: Create wiki page seeking input on f2f meeting venue for brasil Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-104: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/index.php?title=rdf_and_json-ld_usecases Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-103: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-102: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-101: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-100: Send deirdre's text to all of our attendees to tpac (incl guests) http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-dwbp-wg/2014oct/0080.html Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Caroline Burle
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Hadley Beeman
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Caroline Burle

Thursday, 23 October 2014

Re: Agenda for tomorrow Yaso
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Caroline Burle
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Laufer
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Ig Ibert Bittencourt
Re: Agenda for tomorrow Yaso
Agenda for tomorrow Hadley Beeman

Wednesday, 22 October 2014

Re: Ebola Open Data Jam Innovimax W3C

Tuesday, 21 October 2014

Call for Contributors Caroline Burle
Table of Contents DWBP Caroline Burle

Saturday, 18 October 2014

Re: Ebola Open Data Jam Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Re: Ebola Open Data Jam Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Ebola Open Data Jam Steven Adler
RE: From this morning's meeting: new wiki page for second round of use cases... Lee, Deirdre

Friday, 17 October 2014

From this morning's meeting: new wiki page for second round of use cases... Eric Stephan
Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? Eric Stephan
Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
dwbp-ACTION-99: Derive requirements from share-psi workshop, including the one about metadata federation from spain, cf action-32 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-98: Sent an email to tpac registered people about uc document Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Agenda for Penultimate Call before TPAC! Ghislain Atemezing

Thursday, 16 October 2014

Re: Agenda for Penultimate Call before TPAC! Caroline Burle
Re: Agenda for Penultimate Call before TPAC! Yaso
Agenda for Penultimate Call before TPAC! Lee, Deirdre

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

Re: Invitation to Review Use-Cases & Requirements (W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group) Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Open Agenda for Vocabulary Call tomorrow... Eric Stephan
TPAC Taxis Phil Archer
Invitation to Review Use-Cases & Requirements (W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group) Lee, Deirdre
Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? Phil Archer
Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? Makx Dekkers
vocabulary call tomorrow? Eric

Monday, 13 October 2014

Re: COMURI comments Laufer
Publication Request, DWBP UCR doc Phil Archer
RE: COMURI comments Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
Business angle on data on the Web Phil Archer

Friday, 10 October 2014

COMURI comments Laufer
Re: Adding to UCR Doc Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J)
Re: Adding to UCR Doc Ghislain Atemezing
Adding to UCR Doc Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J)
dwbp-ACTION-97: Send out invitation for feedback on published uc document Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-96: Set on the vocabulary call agenda of what we plan on delivering for tpac Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-95: Check zakim booing for tpac Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: ACTION-81: Reviewing COMURI document Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
Re: ACTION-81: Reviewing COMURI document Newton Calegari
RE: ACTION-81: Reviewing COMURI document Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Thursday, 9 October 2014

ACTION-81: Reviewing COMURI document Newton Calegari
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Hadley Beeman
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Christophe Guéret
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Carlos Iglesias
RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Lee, Deirdre
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Eric
Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 Lee, Deirdre

Wednesday, 8 October 2014

RE: Action-79 A review of COMURI Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
UCR ready - please review before Friday Phil Archer

Tuesday, 7 October 2014

Re: Action-79 A review of COMURI Steven Adler
RE: Action-79 A review of COMURI Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu

Monday, 6 October 2014

Sunday, 5 October 2014

Saturday, 4 October 2014

Re: Link to wiki page about Data Usage scenarios Ghislain Atemezing
RE: Link to wiki page about Data Usage scenarios Makx Dekkers

Friday, 3 October 2014

Information Update - Description has changed: Chicago Open Data Webinar USA Toll Free: 888-426-6840,,70360994# Participant Code: 70360994 Steven Adler
Link to wiki page about Data Usage scenarios Bernadette Farias Lóscio
dwbp-ACTION-94: Work with use case editors on finding a way to find use cases for uri persistence Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-93: Finish gs1 closed-data use case with phila Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-91: Suppress detail of bio2rdf use case and incldue link as laufer suggests Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
dwbp-ACTION-90: Create first draft of agenda for negotiations (time zones, conflicts with data shapes wg, etc) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Action-79 A review of COMURI Phil Archer
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call Christophe Guéret
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call Carlos Iglesias

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Notes and summary of today's Vocabulary call Eric Stephan
Re: UCR Forked Laufer
UCR Forked Phil Archer
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-43 (Connections): Connect UCR with BP etc [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Phil Archer
Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time Antoine Isaac
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call Riccardo Albertoni
Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13 Phil Archer
RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call Lee, Deirdre
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Phil Archer
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage Phil Archer
Re: ISSUE-10: Data usage meaning Phil Archer
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage Phil Archer
Agenda for tomorrow's call Hadley Beeman
Re: dwbp-ACTION-89: Create a use case on the research community Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time Eric Stephan
Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time Antoine Isaac
dwbp-ISSUE-47 (Biometrics): Do we need the metrics from Bio2RDF? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

RE: dwbp-ACTION-89: Create a use case on the research community Purohit, Sumit
Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time Eric Stephan
Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time Eric Stephan
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Makx Dekkers
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
Re: Related to Issue-46 Christophe Guéret
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Phil Archer
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
Related to Issue-46 Phil Archer
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Makx Dekkers
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Phil Archer
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Makx Dekkers
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Christophe Guéret
Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Phil Archer
RE: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Makx Dekkers
dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2014 23:41:49 UTC