- From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:31:35 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- CC: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABP9CAGbrmc3Ld+xBknJV2ePvJwYmM5EwWG_bBnrFgwr++CmZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Makx, Very good proposal, I like them too! > I think this is about all we can say: "Data should be persistently > identifiable.". The only thing maybe is explain a little bit more what this > means, e.g. > > > > The identifier that is assigned to a particular resource should resolve, > at least for the foreseeable future, to that same resource or to > information why the resource is no longer there. > > I like the simple approach for the reasons you give. > > What worries me is that we risk getting into a long debate about whether > a DOI resolves or not (IMO of course it doesn't - it only resolves if > you stick it on the end of a URL in which case it is a different > identifier) and what the semantics of a DOI may be (or ORCID or any of > the other similar schemes). > Could we maybe just make one constraint that identifiers have to be web-based in order to be resolvable ? > > The actual syntax of URIs can vary widely, because an organisation will > choose a design that reflects the way they can make and maintain the > commitment to persistence. Some organisations will opt for a semantically > rich syntax (such as the UK Gov approach); others will follow an (almost) > semantics-free design like Tomas' COMURI proposal. > > > > As organisations might have good arguments for selecting a particular > design, this group may not be able to declare one approach 'best practice' > beyond saying that (as someone once said) "persistence is non-negotiable". > > Again, I like that. I'd be in favour of encouraging a more structured > approach, as in the UK examples, but agree we need to recognise, always, > that people can only build on top of what they have, technically and > institutionally. > +1! Christophe -- Onderzoeker +31(0)6 14576494 christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)* DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO. Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres: DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> | www.dans.knaw.nl *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!* http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/ *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)* [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:32:20 UTC