Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time

Hi Eric,

Yes the interdependency between the two vocabularies would be a very good topic to discuss!

Antoine

On 10/2/14 1:39 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
> Antoine,
>
> Thank you for sharing and providing these links, knowing that you weren't on the call I kept the meeting agenda to focus on data usage originally, but I am really glad you were able to re-convey the data quality perspective as input to the discussion.  I don't know if Bart or perhaps others will be on the call as well.
>
> Reading what you shared is interesting is that some of the aspects of data usage we've talked about, are a part of data quality requirements.  I don't recall many discussions about the relationships between data usage and data quality vocabularies, but I think this is something we'll have to keep in mind in the future.  As a case in point:  "metrics" is something data usage vocabulary has recently designated as a need and something that could certainly be leveraged and represents possible inter-dependencies.
>
> One of the the discoveries Bernadette and made about the requirements was the expansion of ideas relating to data usage. This led to a more thorough investigation about the meaning of data usage that included new questions including "metrics/trends" questions [1] that Bernadette and I are compiling.  While the list is still somewhat rough, it was helpful using against our current use case document to see new data usage requirements.
>
> Regarding the F2F meeting, the item you shared would be really good to have.  Based on what I mentioned it might also be nice to talk about inter dependencies  between the vocabularies.  I know the time difference is absolutely brutal, we'll need to be cognizant of this, hopefully trying to catch you and others in Europe at the beginning of the day (4am works for me but I don't think TPAC would be as interested :-) ).
>
> Let's keep this email discussion going!
>
> Eric
>
> References
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_Usage_Use_Cases
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>
>     Dear Eric,
>
>     Huge thanks for keeping the ball rolling. I won't be able to make it tonight, but as an attempt to help the meeting I'm copying some ideas I had discussed with Bart and Phil, and which actually aligns with what Phil has already proposed in the call.
>
>     I will probably not be available much for the F2F. The time difference will make it hard for remote participation, though I'll try...
>
>     We could still propose a one-hour session, during which the group discusses the requirements that they would like to be met by the quality/granularity voc.
>     Starting from the ones in the UCR doc [1], and the ones on the wiki at [2]. It would be great if the group could give input for more details to these requirements!
>
>     Perhaps one can distill ourselves more requirements (as mere bullets, as in the current section on the wiki page) from the other pointers of the "notes" wiki page. But the current list may give already enough material to discuss.
>
>     In any case I would not submit to the discussion the class diagram that Phil has made [3]. Useful as that diagram will certainly be, I don't feel it's the time yet for the group to discuss it. The group could perhaps focus rather on merging  the "requirement material" down in Phil's page [4] with the above mentioned requirements.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Antoine
>
>     [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/__usecasesv1.html#requirements-__for-quality-and-granularity-__description-vocabulary <http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#requirements-for-quality-and-granularity-description-vocabulary>
>     [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Data_quality_notes#__Suggested_requirements <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_notes#Suggested_requirements>:
>     [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Quality_and_Granularity___Description_Vocabulary#Class___Diagram <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_and_Granularity_Description_Vocabulary#Class_Diagram>
>     [4] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Quality_and_Granularity___Description_Vocabulary#Open___Data_Support_Fields <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_and_Granularity_Description_Vocabulary#Open_Data_Support_Fields>
>
>
>     Antoine
>
>     On 10/1/14 9:29 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>
>         https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141002 <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141002>
>
>         On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com <mailto:ericphb@gmail.com> <mailto:ericphb@gmail.com <mailto:ericphb@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
>              My apologies for getting this out a bit late today.
>
>              Two items will be on the agenda:
>              * Review the UCR and see just what requirements are in there and think about how we're going to address them.
>              * Update on Use Case template for Data Usage.
>
>              Vocabulary Call will be tomorrow 12pm US Eastern Standard Time
>
>         http://www.timeanddate.com/__worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=__Bi-Weekly+Editors+Call&iso=__20141002T09&p1=2484&ah=1 <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Bi-Weekly+Editors+Call&iso=20141002T09&p1=2484&ah=1>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 13:29:29 UTC