Andrea Perego
Antoine Isaac
Augusto Herrmann
Bart van Leeuwen
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
- Re: Table of Contents DWBP (Friday, 24 October)
- Re: Table of Contents DWBP (Friday, 24 October)
- Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? (Friday, 17 October)
- Re: Invitation to Review Use-Cases & Requirements (W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group) (Wednesday, 15 October)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 (Friday, 10 October)
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases (Monday, 6 October)
- Link to wiki page about Data Usage scenarios (Friday, 3 October)
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-89: Create a use case on the research community (Thursday, 2 October)
Carlos Iglesias
Caroline Burle
Christophe Guéret
- Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in (Friday, 31 October)
- Re: ISSUE-63: If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else? (Friday, 31 October)
- Re: ISSUE-62: What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived (Friday, 31 October)
- Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in (Friday, 31 October)
- Re: Table of Contents DWBP (Friday, 24 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Friday, 24 October)
- Re: Table of Contents DWBP (Friday, 24 October)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014 (Thursday, 9 October)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call (Friday, 3 October)
- Re: Related to Issue-46 (Wednesday, 1 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Wednesday, 1 October)
Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
- ISSUE-78: What is the best order for the elements in the best practices template (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-77: We need to bring the comuri work into the best practices format agreed at the tpac f2f (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-127: Write description of data identification section (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-126: Put the topic of combining the comuri work with the best practices on the agenda for 14 nov's call (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-125: Review doc about dataset version and look up for standards about dataset version (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-124: Write description as intro to vocab section of bp doc (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-123: Write a description for the beginning of the metadata section (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-122: Wotk with sumit to write at least a description of the best practice(s) around data formats (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-121: Look at linked data bp at http://www.w3.org/tr/ld-bp/#vocabularies and to talk with mark h and antoine to see if the controlled vocab section fits with the data vocabs (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-120: Create an example about metadata description (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-76: What advice do we give about publishing metadata so that we identify the intended outcome without making assumptions that maybe false? (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-75: Whether it would be helpful to this wg if jeni's work at http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ were to be published as a tag finding (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-119: to review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-118: Review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-116: Develop into something that we can reuse and make more like a best practice (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-115: Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-74: Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-72: Is data enrichment in scope for dwbp? (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-71: We have use cases for feedback but is it in scope given the 3 aximoatic criteria resolved at tpac (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-70: Should we include data enrichment in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-113: Check the scoping criteria against the deliverables/commitments in our charter (Friday, 31 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-112: Research and report ways that technical best practices have been tested (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-68: We should define "structured" (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-67: Should we include a best practice around which format to use? (csv, json, json-ld, xml, etc.) (Friday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-66: We need more use cases to get the requirements to define the data usage vocabulary (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-65: How to carry forward the data quality issue - more use cases? available options? text only? machine readable dimensions? (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-64: Jeremy t's expression of concern over 'data must be complete' - not realistic. better to say where it isn't complete (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-63: If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else? (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-62: What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-111: Merge r-citable with the data usage requirements (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-110: Remove r-multiplerepresentations as a duplicate of r-formatmultiple (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-60: Does 4.1.9 accurately reflect the use cases? and can it be better summarised as data availability? (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-109: And annette to write a use case about real-time and bulk data (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-59: We should agree on a definition for "real time" (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-58: What do we mean with bulk 4.1.9 r-accessbulk (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-57: R-datalifecycleprivacy, r-sensitiveprivacy and r-sensitivesecurity and the topics they represent may or not be in scope for the working group (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-56: We need context and examples. do they go into the rec-track documents or into a separate note? (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-55: The word "granularity" can been many things. scope, city/state/country, data aggregation (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-54: The term "sla" is vague, undefined, and may not actually represent an agreement between the publisher and reuser (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-53: Whether sla is/can be thought of as part of the licence or whether it needs to be pulled out spearately? (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-52: Lauter to help us think about how to address our confusion of terms. (glossary?) (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-51: Phil to clarify the use of the word "provenance" any potential confusion it causes (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-50: Bernadette to help us find more use cases on the vocabulary itself (including creating a vocabulary) (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-49: Phil to either improve on the definition of "reference vocabulary", or point to existing definitions (Thursday, 30 October)
- ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-108: Amend/expand r-granularitylevels to cover laufer's question about inheritance â??metadata for the data itself and for the dataset (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-107: Clarify rformatlocalize according to questions in the f2f discussion (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-106: Add a requirement for a suitable format (as per jenit's suggestion) (Thursday, 30 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-105: Create wiki page seeking input on f2f meeting venue for brasil (Friday, 24 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-104: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/index.php?title=rdf_and_json-ld_usecases (Friday, 24 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-103: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios (Friday, 24 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-102: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios (Friday, 24 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-101: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios (Friday, 24 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-100: Send deirdre's text to all of our attendees to tpac (incl guests) http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-dwbp-wg/2014oct/0080.html (Friday, 24 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-99: Derive requirements from share-psi workshop, including the one about metadata federation from spain, cf action-32 (Friday, 17 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-98: Sent an email to tpac registered people about uc document (Friday, 17 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-97: Send out invitation for feedback on published uc document (Friday, 10 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-96: Set on the vocabulary call agenda of what we plan on delivering for tpac (Friday, 10 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-95: Check zakim booing for tpac (Friday, 10 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-94: Work with use case editors on finding a way to find use cases for uri persistence (Friday, 3 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-93: Finish gs1 closed-data use case with phila (Friday, 3 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases (Friday, 3 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-91: Suppress detail of bio2rdf use case and incldue link as laufer suggests (Friday, 3 October)
- dwbp-ACTION-90: Create first draft of agenda for negotiations (time zones, conflicts with data shapes wg, etc) (Friday, 3 October)
- dwbp-ISSUE-47 (Biometrics): Do we need the metrics from Bio2RDF? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Thursday, 2 October)
- dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Wednesday, 1 October)
Debattista, Jeremy
Eric
Eric Stephan
- Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? (Thursday, 30 October)
- From this morning's meeting: new wiki page for second round of use cases... (Friday, 17 October)
- Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? (Friday, 17 October)
- Open Agenda for Vocabulary Call tomorrow... (Wednesday, 15 October)
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases (Monday, 6 October)
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases (Sunday, 5 October)
- Notes and summary of today's Vocabulary call (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time (Wednesday, 1 October)
- Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time (Wednesday, 1 October)
Ghislain Atemezing
Hadley Beeman
Ig Ibert Bittencourt
Innovimax W3C
Laufer
Lee, Deirdre
Makx Dekkers
Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J)
Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
Newton Calegari
Phil Archer
- Re: Apologies for Todays Call (Friday, 31 October)
- Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org (Thursday, 30 October)
- Time zones next week (Friday, 24 October)
- TPAC Taxis (Wednesday, 15 October)
- Re: vocabulary call tomorrow? (Wednesday, 15 October)
- Publication Request, DWBP UCR doc (Monday, 13 October)
- Business angle on data on the Web (Monday, 13 October)
- UCR ready - please review before Friday (Wednesday, 8 October)
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases (Monday, 6 October)
- Action-79 A review of COMURI (Friday, 3 October)
- UCR Forked (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-43 (Connections): Connect UCR with BP etc [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13 (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: ISSUE-10: Data usage meaning (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Wednesday, 1 October)
- Related to Issue-46 (Wednesday, 1 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Wednesday, 1 October)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Wednesday, 1 October)
Purohit, Sumit
Riccardo Albertoni
Steven Adler
- Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org (Thursday, 30 October)
- Re: Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F? (Thursday, 30 October)
- Re: Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org (Wednesday, 29 October)
- Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org (Wednesday, 29 October)
- IBM Launches Humanitarian Initiatives to Help Contain Ebola Outbreak in Africa (Monday, 27 October)
- Ebola Open Data Jam (Saturday, 18 October)
- Re: Action-79 A review of COMURI (Tuesday, 7 October)
- Information Update - Description has changed: Chicago Open Data Webinar USA Toll Free: 888-426-6840,,70360994# Participant Code: 70360994 (Friday, 3 October)
Yaso
Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2014 23:41:49 UTC