Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases

Thanks very much, Eric.

I'd like to add this to the UCR doc tomorrow (as well as editing 
Laufer's use case as discussed last week) and that should get us to a 
point where the WG can consider publishing the next official working draft.

Looking at what you and Sumit have done, I see the new and/or revised 
requirements and these link to specific use cases by number. Can you 
confirm that those numbers are the same as the current editor's draft 
[1]. So that 1,6, 8,10,14,18 means

1 - Building Eye
6 - Dutch Base Registers
8 - Digital Archive of Linked Data
10 - Uruguay
14 - Bio2RDF
18 - OKFN Transport WG

etc.

Secondly, there's some introductory text on the wiki that seems like 
it's worth keeping/including somewhere but I'm not sure where. So... in 
my latest fork I've turned it into a mini section, see [2]. I *could* 
make this part of the intro if you like, and I thought about adding it 
to the challenges but it doesn't seem to quite fit. Although I can add 
to the table by adding a Requirements for closed data and then the new 
ones you've listed.

If you have 5 mins to guide me, I'll try and process this tomorrow.

Anyone, especially Bernadette and Deirdre - if you disagree with what 
I've done do shout.

Phil.

[1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html
[2] http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp-1/usecasesv1.html#open-and-closed-data

On 05/10/2014 17:01, Eric Stephan wrote:
> All,
>
>
> In response to the closed data requirement discussion last week, I've
> amended proposed closed data requirements to the original closed data wiki
> page Sumit started and added corresponding use cases.
>
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Closed_Data_Examples#Candidate_Closed_Data_Requirements_extracted_from_current_github_Use_Cases
>
> As a part of this work you will see a proposed modification to
> R-SensitiveSecurity in attempt to broaden it beyond national security
> interests.
>
> Mark, because of your work on the GS1 use case,  I didn't update any of
> these requirements to the current GS1 use case.
>
> Eric S
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind
>> and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/92
>>
>> Assigned to: Eric Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 18:34:37 UTC