Re: Table of Contents DWBP

Dear Caroline, all,

Looking at the documents, I'd like to suggest to add a section "Data
archival" in the "Best Practices Themes (challenges)" of [1]. Then the two
points

   - Preservation
   - Data versioning

currently found in data publication could be moved there.

The idea is there is that publication and archival are two different phases
of the work-flow.
We can add versioning to the later arguing that one would like to preserve
previous versions and only serve the latest.

Christophe

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Proposed_structure

On 24 October 2014 16:04, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Dear Caroline, all,
>
> As requested in today's call, I had a brief look at the "Draft of the
> content structure of the Best Practices Themes" and "Description of each
> theme on the Table of Contents" at [1].
> I see that
>
> There is the section on controlled vocabularies, that is being worked on
> by Mark and I and mentioned in the previous content list at [2]. Is it
> intentionally left out?
>
> In case not, I think it could be in the "data organization" section of the
> proposed structure at [1].
>
> Kind regards
>
> Antoine
>
> [1]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Proposed_structure
> [2]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Best_Practices
>
>
> On 10/21/14 10:13 PM, Caroline Burle wrote:
> > Ghislain,
> >
> > thank you for your comments, the suggestion to add different
> questions/issues is very welcome! In fact, Bernadette, Newton and I had a
> 2h call yesterday and put some of the questions you suggested on the
> Proposed Structure[1].
> >
> > Phil Archer also gave the input to add “Feedback” as an item, so the
> Data on the Web Lifecycle would be actually a cycle. This is on the Wiki
> also.
> >
> > Furthermore, we added on the TPAC Goals[2]:
> > Description of each theme on the Table of Contents
> > Draft of the content structure of the Best Practices Themes
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Caroline
> >
> > [1]
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Proposed_structure#Mapping_of_Themes.5B1.5D
> > [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/TPAC_2014
> >
> >
> > Em 17/10/14 10:00, Ghislain Atemezing escreveu:
> >> Hi Caroline,
> >> Thanks for this starting document for BP document structure.
> >>
> >>> Bernadette and I edited the TPAC Deliverable Goals.
> >>>
> >>> We have also edited the Proposed Structure of the BP document [2]. We
> have only started discussing the Table of Contents, but it would be great
> if you may take a look and make comments.
> >>
> >> I would suggest to add for each item different questions /issues that
> we might address to be sure that we capture all the requirements.
> >> Find below a first attempt of what I mean..
> >>
> >> ###################################
> >>  1- Data Publisher
> >>          Metadata: What are the minimum metadata to describe a dataset?
> >>             Licenses: How to identify licenses suitable to a dataset ?
> >>             Data quality: How can publishers monitor qualities of their
> datasets?
> >>             Provenance: What type of provenance information to attach
> at metadata level ? Discuss the granularity of PROV data: either meta of
> fine-grained level.
> >>         Interoperability
> >>             What makes a good interoperable datasets ?
> >>       Data access: How to decide if to publish a dump versus API
> options (SPARQL, etc) ? What requirements to take into account ?
> (reliability, time to query dataset, etc.)
> >>             Data formats: Advices for types of formats to publish
> dataset (at least 1/2 stars compliance ? )
> >>             Data granularity: How to publish catalog versus otro type
> of data ?
> >>         Sensitive data (privacy) : How to identify them? Are they worth
> publishing? What are the security mechanisms? Licenses ?
> >>         Data identification: How could a publisher add identify related
> dataset for interconnection or reuse?
> >>         Persistence (data identification?): What rules to take into
> account when releasing a dataset:
> >>             URI ?
> >>             Status of the dataset ?
> >>             Disclaimer ?
> >>             etc..
> >>         Data versioning: How to make a describe a track the versions of
> dataset ?
> >>
> >>
> >>     2- Data Consumer
> >>         Data usage : Models to annotate different applications of
> datasets (e.g., data visualizations, data summarization, data republishing,
> )
> >>
> >> ######################
> >>
> >> WDYT ?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Ghislain
> >
>
>


-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>