- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:04:52 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear Caroline, all, As requested in today's call, I had a brief look at the "Draft of the content structure of the Best Practices Themes" and "Description of each theme on the Table of Contents" at [1]. I see that There is the section on controlled vocabularies, that is being worked on by Mark and I and mentioned in the previous content list at [2]. Is it intentionally left out? In case not, I think it could be in the "data organization" section of the proposed structure at [1]. Kind regards Antoine [1]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Proposed_structure [2]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Best_Practices On 10/21/14 10:13 PM, Caroline Burle wrote: > Ghislain, > > thank you for your comments, the suggestion to add different questions/issues is very welcome! In fact, Bernadette, Newton and I had a 2h call yesterday and put some of the questions you suggested on the Proposed Structure[1]. > > Phil Archer also gave the input to add “Feedback” as an item, so the Data on the Web Lifecycle would be actually a cycle. This is on the Wiki also. > > Furthermore, we added on the TPAC Goals[2]: > Description of each theme on the Table of Contents > Draft of the content structure of the Best Practices Themes > > Kind regards, > Caroline > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Proposed_structure#Mapping_of_Themes.5B1.5D > [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/TPAC_2014 > > > Em 17/10/14 10:00, Ghislain Atemezing escreveu: >> Hi Caroline, >> Thanks for this starting document for BP document structure. >> >>> Bernadette and I edited the TPAC Deliverable Goals. >>> >>> We have also edited the Proposed Structure of the BP document [2]. We have only started discussing the Table of Contents, but it would be great if you may take a look and make comments. >> >> I would suggest to add for each item different questions /issues that we might address to be sure that we capture all the requirements. >> Find below a first attempt of what I mean.. >> >> ################################### >> 1- Data Publisher >> Metadata: What are the minimum metadata to describe a dataset? >> Licenses: How to identify licenses suitable to a dataset ? >> Data quality: How can publishers monitor qualities of their datasets? >> Provenance: What type of provenance information to attach at metadata level ? Discuss the granularity of PROV data: either meta of fine-grained level. >> Interoperability >> What makes a good interoperable datasets ? >> Data access: How to decide if to publish a dump versus API options (SPARQL, etc) ? What requirements to take into account ? (reliability, time to query dataset, etc.) >> Data formats: Advices for types of formats to publish dataset (at least 1/2 stars compliance ? ) >> Data granularity: How to publish catalog versus otro type of data ? >> Sensitive data (privacy) : How to identify them? Are they worth publishing? What are the security mechanisms? Licenses ? >> Data identification: How could a publisher add identify related dataset for interconnection or reuse? >> Persistence (data identification?): What rules to take into account when releasing a dataset: >> URI ? >> Status of the dataset ? >> Disclaimer ? >> etc.. >> Data versioning: How to make a describe a track the versions of dataset ? >> >> >> 2- Data Consumer >> Data usage : Models to annotate different applications of datasets (e.g., data visualizations, data summarization, data republishing, ) >> >> ###################### >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ghislain >
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 14:05:21 UTC