Re: dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases

Hi Phil,

Thanks a lot for the updating!

I think it is important to have a brief explanation about open data x
closed data. However, I think we need something else to make a link between
this explanation and the use cases.

Maybe, instead of creating a new section, the closed data explanation could
be part of Section 3. You can say that use cases consider both Open and
Closed data and then you add the explanation about closed data. What do you
think?

Cheers,
Bernadette



2014-10-06 15:33 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:

> Thanks very much, Eric.
>
> I'd like to add this to the UCR doc tomorrow (as well as editing Laufer's
> use case as discussed last week) and that should get us to a point where
> the WG can consider publishing the next official working draft.
>
> Looking at what you and Sumit have done, I see the new and/or revised
> requirements and these link to specific use cases by number. Can you
> confirm that those numbers are the same as the current editor's draft [1].
> So that 1,6, 8,10,14,18 means
>
> 1 - Building Eye
> 6 - Dutch Base Registers
> 8 - Digital Archive of Linked Data
> 10 - Uruguay
> 14 - Bio2RDF
> 18 - OKFN Transport WG
>
> etc.
>
> Secondly, there's some introductory text on the wiki that seems like it's
> worth keeping/including somewhere but I'm not sure where. So... in my
> latest fork I've turned it into a mini section, see [2]. I *could* make
> this part of the intro if you like, and I thought about adding it to the
> challenges but it doesn't seem to quite fit. Although I can add to the
> table by adding a Requirements for closed data and then the new ones you've
> listed.
>
> If you have 5 mins to guide me, I'll try and process this tomorrow.
>
> Anyone, especially Bernadette and Deirdre - if you disagree with what I've
> done do shout.
>
> Phil.
>
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html
> [2] http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp-1/usecasesv1.html#open-
> and-closed-data
>
>
> On 05/10/2014 17:01, Eric Stephan wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> In response to the closed data requirement discussion last week, I've
>> amended proposed closed data requirements to the original closed data wiki
>> page Sumit started and added corresponding use cases.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Closed_Data_Examples#
>> Candidate_Closed_Data_Requirements_extracted_from_
>> current_github_Use_Cases
>>
>> As a part of this work you will see a proposed modification to
>> R-SensitiveSecurity in attempt to broaden it beyond national security
>> interests.
>>
>> Mark, because of your work on the GS1 use case,  I didn't update any of
>> these requirements to the current GS1 use case.
>>
>> Eric S
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
>> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>  dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye,
>>> wind
>>> and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/92
>>>
>>> Assigned to: Eric Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------