public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from October 2014 by subject

ACTION-105: Create wiki page seeking input on f2f meeting venue for brasil

Action-79 A review of COMURI

ACTION-81: Reviewing COMURI document

Adding to UCR Doc

Agenda for Penultimate Call before TPAC!

Agenda for tomorrow

Agenda for tomorrow's call

Agenda for tomorrow's call 10-10-2014

Apologies for Todays Call

Business angle on data on the Web

Call for Contributors

COMURI comments

Data quality and requirements - discussion for F2F?

dwbp-ACTION-100: Send deirdre's text to all of our attendees to tpac (incl guests) http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-dwbp-wg/2014oct/0080.html

dwbp-ACTION-101: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios

dwbp-ACTION-102: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios

dwbp-ACTION-103: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/data_usage_scenarios

dwbp-ACTION-104: Review https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/index.php?title=rdf_and_json-ld_usecases

dwbp-ACTION-105: Create wiki page seeking input on f2f meeting venue for brasil

dwbp-ACTION-106: Add a requirement for a suitable format (as per jenit's suggestion)

dwbp-ACTION-107: Clarify rformatlocalize according to questions in the f2f discussion

dwbp-ACTION-108: Amend/expand r-granularitylevels to cover laufer's question about inheritance â??metadata for the data itself and for the dataset

dwbp-ACTION-109: And annette to write a use case about real-time and bulk data

dwbp-ACTION-110: Remove r-multiplerepresentations as a duplicate of r-formatmultiple

dwbp-ACTION-111: Merge r-citable with the data usage requirements

dwbp-ACTION-112: Research and report ways that technical best practices have been tested

dwbp-ACTION-113: Check the scoping criteria against the deliverables/commitments in our charter

dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72

dwbp-ACTION-115: Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document

dwbp-ACTION-116: Develop into something that we can reuse and make more like a best practice

dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design

dwbp-ACTION-118: Review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/

dwbp-ACTION-119: to review the urls in data primer http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/

dwbp-ACTION-120: Create an example about metadata description

dwbp-ACTION-121: Look at linked data bp at http://www.w3.org/tr/ld-bp/#vocabularies and to talk with mark h and antoine to see if the controlled vocab section fits with the data vocabs

dwbp-ACTION-122: Wotk with sumit to write at least a description of the best practice(s) around data formats

dwbp-ACTION-123: Write a description for the beginning of the metadata section

dwbp-ACTION-124: Write description as intro to vocab section of bp doc

dwbp-ACTION-125: Review doc about dataset version and look up for standards about dataset version

dwbp-ACTION-126: Put the topic of combining the comuri work with the best practices on the agenda for 14 nov's call

dwbp-ACTION-127: Write description of data identification section

dwbp-ACTION-89: Create a use case on the research community

dwbp-ACTION-90: Create first draft of agenda for negotiations (time zones, conflicts with data shapes wg, etc)

dwbp-ACTION-91: Suppress detail of bio2rdf use case and incldue link as laufer suggests

dwbp-ACTION-92: Gather closed-data requirements from the buildingeye, wind and gs1 use cases, and match requirements to any other use cases

dwbp-ACTION-93: Finish gs1 closed-data use case with phila

dwbp-ACTION-94: Work with use case editors on finding a way to find use cases for uri persistence

dwbp-ACTION-95: Check zakim booing for tpac

dwbp-ACTION-96: Set on the vocabulary call agenda of what we plan on delivering for tpac

dwbp-ACTION-97: Send out invitation for feedback on published uc document

dwbp-ACTION-98: Sent an email to tpac registered people about uc document

dwbp-ACTION-99: Derive requirements from share-psi workshop, including the one about metadata federation from spain, cf action-32

dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage

dwbp-ISSUE-43 (Connections): Connect UCR with BP etc [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

dwbp-ISSUE-46 (PIDs): How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

dwbp-ISSUE-47 (Biometrics): Do we need the metrics from Bio2RDF? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

Ebola Open Data Jam

From this morning's meeting: new wiki page for second round of use cases...

FW [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.1 Release

IBM Launches Humanitarian Initiatives to Help Contain Ebola Outbreak in Africa

Information Update - Description has changed: Chicago Open Data Webinar USA Toll Free: 888-426-6840,,70360994# Participant Code: 70360994

Invitation to Review Use-Cases & Requirements (W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group)

ISSUE-10: Data usage meaning

ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists

ISSUE-49: Phil to either improve on the definition of "reference vocabulary", or point to existing definitions

ISSUE-50: Bernadette to help us find more use cases on the vocabulary itself (including creating a vocabulary)

ISSUE-51: Phil to clarify the use of the word "provenance" any potential confusion it causes

ISSUE-52: Lauter to help us think about how to address our confusion of terms. (glossary?)

ISSUE-53: Whether sla is/can be thought of as part of the licence or whether it needs to be pulled out spearately?

ISSUE-54: The term "sla" is vague, undefined, and may not actually represent an agreement between the publisher and reuser

ISSUE-55: The word "granularity" can been many things. scope, city/state/country, data aggregation

ISSUE-56: We need context and examples. do they go into the rec-track documents or into a separate note?

ISSUE-57: R-datalifecycleprivacy, r-sensitiveprivacy and r-sensitivesecurity and the topics they represent may or not be in scope for the working group

ISSUE-58: What do we mean with bulk 4.1.9 r-accessbulk

ISSUE-59: We should agree on a definition for "real time"

ISSUE-60: Does 4.1.9 accurately reflect the use cases? and can it be better summarised as data availability?

ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in

ISSUE-62: What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived

ISSUE-63: If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else?

ISSUE-64: Jeremy t's expression of concern over 'data must be complete' - not realistic. better to say where it isn't complete

ISSUE-65: How to carry forward the data quality issue - more use cases? available options? text only? machine readable dimensions?

ISSUE-66: We need more use cases to get the requirements to define the data usage vocabulary

ISSUE-67: Should we include a best practice around which format to use? (csv, json, json-ld, xml, etc.)

ISSUE-68: We should define "structured"

ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

ISSUE-70: Should we include data enrichment in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

ISSUE-71: We have use cases for feedback but is it in scope given the 3 aximoatic criteria resolved at tpac

ISSUE-72: Is data enrichment in scope for dwbp?

ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc?

ISSUE-74: Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc

ISSUE-75: Whether it would be helpful to this wg if jeni's work at http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ were to be published as a tag finding

ISSUE-76: What advice do we give about publishing metadata so that we identify the intended outcome without making assumptions that maybe false?

ISSUE-77: We need to bring the comuri work into the best practices format agreed at the tpac f2f

ISSUE-78: What is the best order for the elements in the best practices template

Link to wiki page about Data Usage scenarios

Live DWBP Use Case: eboladata.org

Notes and summary of today's Vocabulary call

Open Agenda for Vocabulary Call tomorrow...

Our own meme

Publication Request, DWBP UCR doc

Related to Issue-46

Table of Contents DWBP

Time zones next week

TPAC 2014

TPAC Taxis

UCR Forked

UCR ready - please review before Friday

Vocabulary Call Thursday 12pm US Eastern Standard Time

vocabulary call tomorrow?

W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2014 23:41:49 UTC