Re: ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in

Hoi,

The concrete practice of digital preservation which is attribute
identifiers to datasets, prevent bit-rot, monitor for file format
obsolescence, manage duplicate copies, etc is rightly out of scope.
However, IMHO, the requirement that one should be able to dump Web Data and
send it to a digital trusted repository is in scope. We should have
guidelines that say how to do that, for instance this could go along the
lines of "dump your data as JSON-LD and place a reference to the dataset
URI the archival institute gives you back".

Cheers,
Christophe


On 30 October 2014 23:05, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> ISSUE-61: R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe,
> who put it in
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/61
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>