ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2022 by date

Wednesday, 28 December 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 25 December 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 24 December 2022

• Re: CBOR versus HTTP Message Signature Anders Rundgren

Friday, 23 December 2022

• Re: CBOR versus HTTP Message Signature Justin Richer
• Re: CBOR versus HTTP Message Signature Anders Rundgren
• Re: CBOR versus HTTP Message Signature Justin Richer
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt Mark Nottingham
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 19 December 2022

• Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• CBOR versus HTTP Message Signature Anders Rundgren

Sunday, 18 December 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 16 December 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Erik Nygren

Thursday, 15 December 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 14 December 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases David Schinazi

Monday, 12 December 2022

• Re: HTTPdir creation Lucas Pardue
• HTTPdir creation Francesca Palombini

Sunday, 11 December 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 9 December 2022

• Re: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Lucas Pardue
• Re: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Tommy Pauly
• Re: [netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-13.txt> (An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 7 December 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Kazuho Oku

Tuesday, 6 December 2022

• retrofit relaxed algorithms Julian Reschke
• Call for Adoption: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Mark Nottingham
• httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 116 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

Monday, 5 December 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-client-cert-field-04 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

Sunday, 4 December 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 3 December 2022

• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Willy Tarreau
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham

Friday, 2 December 2022

• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Justin Richer
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Roy T. Fielding
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Samuel Hurst
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Roy T. Fielding
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-cert-field-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Justin Richer
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Carsten Bormann
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Lucas Pardue
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Martin J. Dürst
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp

Thursday, 1 December 2022

• Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Erik Nygren
• signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Julian Reschke
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Samuel Hurst
• Re: Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Lucas Pardue
• Digests, signatures and chunk extensions Samuel Hurst
• Re: HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Glenn Strauss

Wednesday, 30 November 2022

• HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases Tommy Pauly
• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3-02 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

Tuesday, 29 November 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-13.txt> (An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 27 November 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Wednesday, 23 November 2022

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit and signatures Justin Richer

Tuesday, 22 November 2022

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit and signatures Mark Nottingham
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit and signatures Justin Richer

Monday, 21 November 2022

• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-15 Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-15.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Collapsing private requests Amos Jeffries
• Re: Collapsing private requests Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 20 November 2022

• draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit and signatures Henry Story
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 18 November 2022

• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Kyle Rose

Thursday, 17 November 2022

• Test Suite for Signature? Space to discuss corner cases? Henry Story

Wednesday, 16 November 2022

• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer

Tuesday, 15 November 2022

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-14.txt Justin Richer
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-14.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Ilari Liusvaara
• Collapsing private requests Erik Witt
• Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Kyle Rose

Monday, 14 November 2022

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt Ben Schwartz

Sunday, 13 November 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 12 November 2022

• DRAFT minutes from London Mark Nottingham

Friday, 11 November 2022

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt Amos Jeffries
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt Ben Schwartz

Thursday, 10 November 2022

• Please send feedback about leadership candidates to NOMCOM Mark Nottingham
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-10 Manger, James

Wednesday, 9 November 2022

• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-10 Roberto Polli
• Re: Erratas for HTTPBIS documents Julian Reschke
• Re: Erratas for HTTPBIS documents Francesca Palombini
• [Errata Rejected] RFC9112 (7214) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC9110 (7138) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC9110 (7109) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC8586 (5704) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8188 (5516) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8164 (5490) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7725 (5512) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7725 (5181) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Rejected] RFC6266 (5383) RFC Errata System

Tuesday, 8 November 2022

• Addressing WGLC Issues for Signatures Justin Richer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-13.txt> (An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham
• Re: Erratas for HTTPBIS documents Mark Nottingham
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-10 Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-10 Lucas Pardue

Monday, 7 November 2022

• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Wenbo Zhu
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-11.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Erratas for HTTPBIS documents Francesca Palombini
• Re: PEM feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer

Sunday, 6 November 2022

• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-10 Murray S. Kucherawy
• Londong meetup and Zulip threads (Message Signing example) Henry Story
• PEM feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Henry Story
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 5 November 2022

• HTTP remote debugging Soni L.

Wednesday, 2 November 2022

• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Wenbo Zhu
• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Alt-SvcB Martin Thomson
• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) squid3@treenet.co.nz
• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Wenbo Zhu

Tuesday, 1 November 2022

• [Errata Verified] RFC9110 (7105) RFC Errata System
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7138) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7109) Julian Reschke
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Alt-SvcB David Benjamin

Monday, 31 October 2022

• Re: combined field value, Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer
• Re: combined field value, Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• Re: combined field value, Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7214) Willy Tarreau
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7214) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7214) Willy Tarreau
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7214) RFC Errata System

Sunday, 30 October 2022

• Working Group Last Call: Client-Cert HTTP Header Field Mark Nottingham
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 28 October 2022

• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Roberto Polli
• Re: combined field value, Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• combined field value, Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Privacy-pass] Working Group Last Call for the Privacy Pass HTTP Authentication Scheme Tommy Pauly
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Privacy-pass] Working Group Last Call for the Privacy Pass HTTP Authentication Scheme Julian Reschke
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-modern-http-proxies-00.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: [Privacy-pass] Working Group Last Call for the Privacy Pass HTTP Authentication Scheme Tommy Pauly

Thursday, 27 October 2022

• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Justin Richer

Wednesday, 26 October 2022

• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Alt-SvcB Tommy Jensen
• Re: Alt-SvcB Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Alt-SvcB Martin Thomson
• Re: Alt-SvcB David Schinazi
• Re: Alt-SvcB Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 25 October 2022

• Re: Alt-SvcB Lucas Pardue
• Re: Alt-SvcB David Schinazi
• Re: Alt-SvcB Tommy Pauly
• Re: Alt-SvcB David Schinazi
• Re: Alt-SvcB Lucas Pardue
• Re: Alt-SvcB Tommy Pauly
• Re: Alt-SvcB Ian Swett
• Re: Alt-SvcB David Schinazi
• Alt-SvcB Martin Thomson

Monday, 24 October 2022

• extension for feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 ? Henry Story

Sunday, 23 October 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 21 October 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke

Thursday, 20 October 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Ben Schwartz
• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Martin Thomson
• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) David Schinazi

Wednesday, 19 October 2022

• Re: Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Mark Nottingham
• Call for Adoption: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication David Schinazi
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-cert-field-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Ben Schwartz
• Re: IETF HTTPBIS I-D submission - please review draft-sandowicz-httpbis-httpa2 Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 18 October 2022

• Re: IETF HTTPBIS I-D submission - please review draft-sandowicz-httpbis-httpa2 Mark Nottingham
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication David Schinazi
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Ben Schwartz
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Ryan Hamilton
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Ben Schwartz

Monday, 17 October 2022

• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Dick Hardt
• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Backman, Annabelle
• Re: Proposal for new `Partitioned` cookie attribute Dylan Cutler
• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Anders Rundgren
• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Anders Rundgren
• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Julian Reschke
• Re: feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Anders Rundgren

Sunday, 16 October 2022

• feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-13 Dick Hardt
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 14 October 2022

• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-modern-http-proxies-00.txt Ben Schwartz
• HTTP Authentication with SASL Rick van Rein

Thursday, 13 October 2022

• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication David Schinazi
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Nick Harper
• Re: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Ilari Liusvaara
• HTTP Unprompted Authentication David Schinazi
• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Julian Reschke
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Julian Reschke
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Willy Tarreau
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Mark Nottingham
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Mark Nottingham
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Julian Reschke
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Willy Tarreau

Wednesday, 12 October 2022

• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope David Schinazi
• Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope Martin Thomson
• Re: [Masque] HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for DNS Information Mark Nottingham
• Revising Structured Fields: scope Mark Nottingham
• Draft minutes for the October interim Mark Nottingham
• [Errata Rejected] RFC9110 (7107) RFC Errata System
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-binary-structured-headers-03.txt Mark Nottingham

Monday, 10 October 2022

• Fwd: [Masque] HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for DNS Information Tommy Pauly

Sunday, 9 October 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 7 October 2022

• Fwd: IETF 115 Preliminary Agenda Mark Nottingham
• Re: Idempotency-Key for resuming requests (TUS Resumable Uploads Protocol) Austin William Wright
• Re: Idempotency-Key for resuming requests (TUS Resumable Uploads Protocol) Marius Kleidl

Wednesday, 5 October 2022

• Idempotency-Key for resuming requests (TUS Resumable Uploads Protocol) Austin William Wright
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-10-05 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 3 October 2022

• Re: Deployment of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice (Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) Wenbo Zhu

Sunday, 2 October 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 December 2022 00:59:12 UTC