Re: Erratas for HTTPBIS documents

Hi Francesca,

I checked all of these and I believe you have the correct resolutions listed.

Thanks!


> On 7 Nov 2022, at 3:23 pm, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  
> I have been looking at the list of erratas still in reported state for the HTTPBIS working group: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2&wg_acronym=httpbis&presentation=table and although most of these have been discussed in the mailing list, I’d like to summarize how I plan on closing them in the next days. You can see my suggestions below, please let me know if you disagree.
>  
> Thanks,
> Francesca (as ART AD)
>  
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5383 rejected (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/OM6VwjIFPOOzdDI6vf-5m-3LUVo/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5181 hold for doc update (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/PiPCroru-E_Idtw645oiGQVB1_E/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5512 rejected (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/e9w00PqeTSJJcBub4VMR3gYpGQ4/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5490 hold for doc update
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5516 hold for doc update (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/ZLpEKoZwCtY9bwVFwT26IU4DjB0/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5704 verified (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/_wvndTuLeETIXElAKo_AOVGn_vo/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7109 verified + change type to editorial (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/UOK64nlwdxBDOSm_uYUq9eafam0/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7138 verified (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/FuKyfn6aBh8AYxusgZqovjc6KJ0/)
>  
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7214 rejected (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/jd4nG56q3TAAvtZV_BAf9U3u3hU/)

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/