Hi Francesca, I checked all of these and I believe you have the correct resolutions listed. Thanks! > On 7 Nov 2022, at 3:23 pm, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been looking at the list of erratas still in reported state for the HTTPBIS working group: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2&wg_acronym=httpbis&presentation=table and although most of these have been discussed in the mailing list, I’d like to summarize how I plan on closing them in the next days. You can see my suggestions below, please let me know if you disagree. > > Thanks, > Francesca (as ART AD) > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5383 rejected (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/OM6VwjIFPOOzdDI6vf-5m-3LUVo/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5181 hold for doc update (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/PiPCroru-E_Idtw645oiGQVB1_E/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5512 rejected (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/e9w00PqeTSJJcBub4VMR3gYpGQ4/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5490 hold for doc update > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5516 hold for doc update (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/ZLpEKoZwCtY9bwVFwT26IU4DjB0/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5704 verified (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/_wvndTuLeETIXElAKo_AOVGn_vo/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7109 verified + change type to editorial (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/UOK64nlwdxBDOSm_uYUq9eafam0/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7138 verified (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/FuKyfn6aBh8AYxusgZqovjc6KJ0/) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7214 rejected (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpbisa/jd4nG56q3TAAvtZV_BAf9U3u3hU/) -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2022 21:31:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 28 January 2023 21:29:46 UTC