- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
- To: james.synge@gmail.com, fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
- Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC9110, "HTTP Semantics". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7107 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: James Synge <james.synge@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2022-08-31 Rejected by: RFC Editor Section: 6.5.1 Original Text ------------- For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1 allows a trailer section to be sent after the content (Section 7.1.2 of [HTTP/1.1]). Corrected Text -------------- For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1 allows a trailer section to be sent after the content (Section ?.?.? of [HTTP/1.1]). Notes ----- Section 7.1.2 does not exist. It isn't clear to me which section is the intended target of the reference. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Errata rejected per Julian Reschke. Section 7.1.2 does exist. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112#section-7.1.2>. -------------------------------------- RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19) -------------------------------------- Title : HTTP Semantics Publication Date : June 2022 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : HTTP Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2022 21:40:13 UTC