Good point, we'll do that as an informative reference. ________________________________ From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 1:22 AM To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Cc: henry.story@bblfish.net <henry.story@bblfish.net>; HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit and signatures > On 22 Nov 2022, at 11:44 am, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote: > > We would refer to the retrofit draft non-normatively, or the field in the IANA table that the retrofit draft creates, if those were available at the time of publication. You can reference it non-normatively and the RFC Editor will update the reference if it's published on a compatible timeline; otherwise I believe you can reference an Internet-Draft non-normatively. You can also take the reference out at the last minute if it's holding things up. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2022 12:11:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 28 January 2023 21:29:46 UTC