On 01.12.2022 18:35, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Julian Reschke writes: > >> 1) would require delaying the signatures spec until sfbis is ready - I >> don't think we want that, unless we can finish sfbis *really* quick (can >> we?) > > We have a very small TODO list for sfbis and the actual editing should > not take long, so I think the limiting factor would be the approval process > would be the critical path ? If we ship sfbis with just the minimal changes we have decided to be in scope, then this shouldn't be a problem. That said, LC on draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis surfaced issues with the missing support for non-ASCII characters in sf strings, and we really shouldn't ignore that issue. Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 1 December 2022 18:49:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:08 UTC