W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2022

Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:47:38 +0000
Message-Id: <202212022147.2B2LlcqP008154@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke writes:

> So why are revising the spec then to add sf-date???

As I already said:  Because sf-date comes with very significant
performance benefits.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2022 21:47:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 28 January 2023 21:29:47 UTC