W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2022

Re: signatures vs sf-date

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 17:35:34 +0000
Message-Id: <202212011735.2B1HZYgm004808@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Julian Reschke writes:

> 1) would require delaying the signatures spec until sfbis is ready - I
> don't think we want that, unless we can finish sfbis *really* quick (can
> we?)

We have a very small TODO list for sfbis and the actual editing should
not take long, so I think the limiting factor would be the approval process
would be the critical path ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2022 17:35:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 1 February 2023 02:18:31 UTC