Hi there. Currently the signatures draft relies on structured fields as defined in RFC 8941 - that is, without the date type we are currently working on. We need to make a few decisions here: 1) Should signatures *use* the date type in the field(s) it defines ("created" TS)? 2) When signing parts of a SF shaped field, should it support RFC 8941bis in some way? 1) would require delaying the signatures spec until sfbis is ready - I don't think we want that, unless we can finish sfbis *really* quick (can we?) If we do *not* wait for sfbis to be ready, should we add some text that would allow implementers to make use of sfbis-shaped fields? Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 1 December 2022 17:16:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 1 February 2023 02:18:31 UTC