W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2022

Re: signatures vs sf-date

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 15:07:21 +0000
Message-Id: <202212021507.2B2F7LGb006281@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ilari Liusvaara writes:

> [2] One would think that expiry times are always exclusive, but X.509
> has inclusive expiry time (e.g., expiry at 2400Z is marked as expiry
> on 235959Z the same day).

Purely out of time-nut curiousity:

Since the leap-second is CCITT's own (TF.460), do you happen to
know if X.509 mention what to do about 23:59:60 ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2022 15:07:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:08 UTC