Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date

On 02.12.2022 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...

FWIW: please see
<https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/commit/ebf9465504713876e6cd507629511313bdbce39c>
- which adds a new string encoding scheme on top of sf-string, just for
the "Problem" header field. So yes, it's pretty clear that this is a
problem worth solving.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 2 December 2022 10:57:57 UTC