Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures vs sf-date

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:57:42 +0100 Message-ID: <7b7f714d-890e-db90-4922-cfbc46b3e999@gmx.de> To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 28 January 2023 21:29:47 UTC

On 02.12.2022 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...

FWIW: please see
<https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/commit/ebf9465504713876e6cd507629511313bdbce39c>
- which adds a new string encoding scheme on top of sf-string, just for
the "Problem" header field. So yes, it's pretty clear that this is a
problem worth solving.

Best regards, Julian