www-ws-desc@w3.org from June 2002 by subject

[amtf] my view of what the Abstract model should do and why

[soapbuilders] NMTokens, NCNames, PortTypes, and Bindings.

Abstract model ednote?

ACTION: All wg members to review editorial issues by July 11

ACTION: All wg members to review part 1 and part 2 by July 4

ACTION: All WG members to review redundancy issues by next week

Agenda for 20 June 2002 WS Description WG

Agenda for 27 June 2002 WS Description WG

Agenda for 6 June 2002 WS Description WG

an image processing use case for wsdl

Analysis of WSD Requirements by WS Arch

Architecture WG Requirements vis-a-vis WSDL WG Requirements

Doubly revised extensibility proposal

Draft agenda: 24 June TAG teleconference (Arch document, WSA update)

Draft primer outline

Editorial issue - Terminology for Operation types

elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema..

Extensibility proposal from today

Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])

FTF meeting questions food

Fwd: Analysis of WSD Requirements by WS Arch

I will not be able to attend the today's conference call

Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body )

issue "issue-clarify elements"

Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute

Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model

issue 26: transmission primitives

issue 34: Should portTypes be extensible?

issue 37: Should we remove parameter order?

issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where

issue 42: Shall "element" attribute of "part" only refer to elements defined in schema?

issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"?

issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"?

Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body

issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?

issue 60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts

ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns

issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]))

issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>

issue: service type

Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions concrete bindings

Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitionsconcrete bindings

Issue: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts

issues 35 & 36

Issues 35, 36, 37

late regrets

MEP and Operations

Minutes 20 June 2002 WS Desc telcon

Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon

Minutes, 6 June 2002 WS Description telcon

Minutes, Wed Afternoon 12 June 2002 FTF

New issue: Representing safe operations (was: [TAG] how to use GET to make resources addressable)

Notes on the flip chart

operation overloading issue

Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]

Ports, Names, Symbol Spaces and targetNamespace

Proposal for dealing with solicit/response and notification

proposal for resolving service type issues

Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30

Rationale to close the operation overloading issue

Raw minutes for Tuesday afternoon

raw minutes from 2002-06-10 afternoon

Raw Minutes from 6-11 AM

raw minutes from Monday AM

Regrets

Regrets for 6-20 call

Reminder: WS Desc telcon Thursday 6 June 2002

Resolved issues, 27 June 2002

Second draft June FTF Agenda

Second draft June FTF Agenda - issues to be discussed

service name as local part of a qname

SOAP Binding Faults

SOAP Binding: Is body/@use required?

Target namespace in WSDL

Text for extensibility section

updated draft

updated draft of WSDL 1.2 (Part 1) ready for review

updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 Part 2: Bindings

updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec

W3C WSDL WG Issues: Non-SOAP HTTP Binding

WS Desc WG Usage Scenarios published

WSDL 1.2: Updated draft (June 30)

WSDL SOAP Binding schema does not reflect the spec

WSDL Version 1.2 Part 2: Bindings, date 2002/4/11

＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 15:05:21 UTC