W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Fw: issue: service type

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:47:17 +0600
Message-ID: <09c401c20c00$a34e5bb0$0aaa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion 
that I can recall. Is this issue so boring??

Also related is the following:
    <issue id="issue-multiple-services">
      <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head>
      WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL
      file. This has caused confusion amongst users.
      <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
    </issue>

Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-)

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: issue: service type


> I would like to open discussion on the following issue:
> 
> <issue id="issue-service-type">
>   <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head>
>   WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no
>   abstract analog. 
>   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> </issue>
> 
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 15:47:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT