W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]))

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:11:06 +0600
Message-ID: <01ad01c21f12$3c677240$03aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

"Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com> writes:
> I have also seen proposals limiting one service per WSDL. If that makes
> through this restriction would not only restrict one from putting such
> related ports not only in the same service but also in the same WSDL as
> they need to be in separate services. Given the other restriction that
> was proposed in the conference call that every WSDL MUST have a unique
> targetNamespace, it will result in these not being in the same
> targetNamespace as well..

We resolved the multiple services issue too at the F2F saying you
can have >= 1 service(s) in a single WSDL document. I was pushing to
have a single (complete) doc restricted to exactly one serviceType
but >=1 service(s), all of that single serviceType, but didn't get
much (any?) support for it.

Bye,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Jonathan Marsh"
<jmarsh@microsoft.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of
part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service
Description Telcon]))
Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 22:11:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT