www-ws-desc@w3.org from June 2002 by author

Bob Cunnings

• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)

butek@us.ibm.com

• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 17 June)

Carl Binding

• WSDL Version 1.2 Part 2: Bindings, date 2002/4/11 (Wednesday, 19 June)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Thursday, 27 June)

Christopher Ferris

• Analysis of WSD Requirements by WS Arch (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)

Dale Moberg

• RE: Proposal for dealing with solicit/response and notification (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: MEP and Operations (Thursday, 13 June)

Dave Hollander

• RE: Target namespace in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 June)

David Booth

• Re: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Thursday, 20 June)
• Draft primer outline (Tuesday, 11 June)
• RE: Editorial issue - Terminology for Operation types (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: issue: service type (Thursday, 6 June)
• WS Desc WG Usage Scenarios published (Wednesday, 5 June)

David Cleary

• RE: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions concrete bindings (Tuesday, 4 June)

Dilber, Ayse, ALASO

• RE: FTF meeting questions food (Thursday, 6 June)

don@lexmark.com

• Regrets (Thursday, 13 June)

FABLET Youenn

• Re: MEP and Operations (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: MEP and Operations (Monday, 17 June)
• MEP and Operations (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [amtf] my view of what the Abstract model should do and why (Thursday, 6 June)

Gaertner, Dietmar

• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 17 June)

Glen Daniels

• Issues 35, 36, 37 (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)

Hao He

• Notes on the flip chart (Tuesday, 11 June)
• RE: an image processing use case for wsdl (Tuesday, 11 June)
• an image processing use case for wsdl (Tuesday, 11 June)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: Target namespace in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Proposal for dealing with solicit/response and notification (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: issue: service type (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: issue: service type (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: issue: service type (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Fw: issue: service type (Wednesday, 5 June)
• [amtf] my view of what the Abstract model should do and why (Wednesday, 5 June)

James M Snell

• SOAP Binding Faults (Monday, 10 June)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon] (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30 (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: WSDL SOAP Binding schema does not reflect the spec (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30 (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: W3C WSDL WG Issues: Non-SOAP HTTP Binding (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions concrete bindings (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Target namespace in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Minutes 20 June 2002 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: SOAP Binding Faults (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Abstract model ednote? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Friday, 21 June)
• updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 Part 2: Bindings (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: issue 34: Should portTypes be extensible? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: issue 26: transmission primitives (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Issues 35, 36, 37 (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: WSDL Version 1.2 Part 2: Bindings, date 2002/4/11 (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: MEP and Operations (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: I will not be able to attend the today's conference call (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: proposal for resolving service type issues (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: proposal for resolving service type issues (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Issue: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Issue: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: New issue: Representing safe operations (was: [TAG] how to use GET to make resources addressable) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• RE: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Thursday, 20 June)

Jeffrey Schlimmer

• RE: Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30 (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Draft agenda: 24 June TAG teleconference (Arch document, WSA update) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: issue 60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue 26: transmission primitives (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue 34: Should portTypes be extensible? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Issues 35, 36, 37 (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: WSDL Version 1.2 Part 2: Bindings, date 2002/4/11 (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: W3C WSDL WG Issues: Non-SOAP HTTP Binding (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: issue: service type (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: proposal for resolving service type issues (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: proposal for resolving service type issues (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: MEP and Operations (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Architecture WG Requirements vis-a-vis WSDL WG Requirements (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RE: SOAP Binding: Is body/@use required? (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: issue: service type (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)
• SOAP Binding: Is body/@use required? (Thursday, 6 June)

Jochen.Ruetschlin@DaimlerChrysler.com

• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 14 June)

Jonathan Marsh

• Resolved issues, 27 June 2002 (Friday, 28 June)
• Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon] (Thursday, 27 June)
• ACTION: All wg members to review part 1 and part 2 by July 4 (Thursday, 27 June)
• ACTION: All wg members to review editorial issues by July 11 (Thursday, 27 June)
• Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon (Thursday, 27 June)
• Agenda for 27 June 2002 WS Description WG (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Minutes, Wed Afternoon 12 June 2002 FTF (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body ) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Target namespace in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• ACTION: All WG members to review redundancy issues by next week (Thursday, 20 June)
• Agenda for 20 June 2002 WS Description WG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 17 June)
• Second draft June FTF Agenda (Friday, 7 June)
• Minutes, 6 June 2002 WS Description telcon (Friday, 7 June)
• Agenda for 6 June 2002 WS Description WG (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal (Tuesday, 4 June)

Joyce Yang

• Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Thursday, 13 June)

jpauhlsson@echangeur.fr

• late regrets (Thursday, 20 June)

kk@w3.org

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ (Thursday, 27 June)

Lind, Steven D, ALASO

• Raw Minutes from 6-11 AM (Thursday, 13 June)

Liu, Kevin

• RE: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Target namespace in WSDL (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• Regrets for 6-20 call (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Second draft June FTF Agenda - issues to be discussed (Tuesday, 11 June)

mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com

• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 21 June)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]) (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Target namespace in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body ) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body ) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Target namespace in WSDL (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Ports, Names, Symbol Spaces and targetNamespace (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"? (Friday, 21 June)

Matt Long

• RE: issue: service type (Tuesday, 4 June)

michael.mahan@nokia.com

• Minutes 20 June 2002 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 25 June)

Paul Cotton

• RE: New issue: Representing safe operations (was: [TAG] how to use GET to make resources addressable) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Draft agenda: 24 June TAG teleconference (Arch document, WSA update) (Saturday, 29 June)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Fwd: Analysis of WSD Requirements by WS Arch (Wednesday, 12 June)
• raw minutes from 2002-06-10 afternoon (Tuesday, 11 June)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Target namespace in WSDL (Thursday, 27 June)
• elementFormDefault="qualified" in WSDL Schema.. (Thursday, 27 June)
• WSDL SOAP Binding schema does not reflect the spec (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body ) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body ) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions concrete bindings (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Proposal for dealing with solicit/response and notification (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: issue 60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Fw: [soapbuilders] NMTokens, NCNames, PortTypes, and Bindings. (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: Issue: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Issue: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitionsconcrete bindings (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions concrete bindings (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions concrete bindings (Tuesday, 4 June)

Roberto Chinnici

• Raw minutes for Tuesday afternoon (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Extensibility proposal from today (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Doubly revised extensibility proposal (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Doubly revised extensibility proposal (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Doubly revised extensibility proposal (Monday, 3 June)

ryman@ca.ibm.com

• Re: Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30 (Thursday, 27 June)
• Proposal to Resolve encodingStyle Issues #5 and #30 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: issue: service type (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: an image processing use case for wsdl (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: an image processing use case for wsdl (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: Fw: issue: service type (Monday, 10 June)

Sadiq, Waqar

• I will not be able to attend the today's conference call (Thursday, 13 June)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: service name as local part of a qname (Sunday, 30 June)
• WSDL 1.2: Updated draft (June 30) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])) (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])) (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]) (Friday, 28 June)
• Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon]) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon] (Friday, 28 June)
• updated draft of WSDL 1.2 (Part 1) ready for review (Thursday, 27 June)
• updated draft (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "defini tions"? (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Inteaction between message and binding ( was RE: Issue 4: Use of namespace attribute on soap:body ) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Wednesday, 26 June)
• issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Target namespace in WSDL (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Ports, Names, Symbol Spaces and targetNamespace (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Abstract model ednote? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Fw: Draft agenda: 24 June TAG teleconference (Arch document, WSA update) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Friday, 21 June)
• issue 42: Shall "element" attribute of "part" only refer to elements defined in schema? (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue "issue-clarify elements" (Thursday, 20 June)
• updated editor's copy of WSDL 1.2 spec (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 26: transmission primitives (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 34: Should portTypes be extensible? (Thursday, 20 June)
• issues 35 & 36 (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 37: Should we remove parameter order? (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"? (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? (Thursday, 20 June)
• issue 60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Regrets (Thursday, 13 June)
• operation overloading issue (Thursday, 13 June)
• raw minutes from Monday AM (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: proposal for resolving service type issues (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Fw: [soapbuilders] NMTokens, NCNames, PortTypes, and Bindings. (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: proposal for resolving service type issues (Monday, 10 June)
• proposal for resolving service type issues (Saturday, 8 June)
• Re: issue: service type (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: issue: service type (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: New issue: Representing safe operations (was: [TAG] how to use GET to make resources addressable) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Fw: issue: service type (Tuesday, 4 June)

Sedukhin, Igor

• RE: Text for extensibility section (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Text for extensibility section (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Text for extensibility section (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal (Monday, 3 June)

sggraham@us.ibm.com

• Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon] (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition> (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Target namespace in WSDL (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: proposal for resolving service type issues (Tuesday, 11 June)

Steve Tuecke

• Re: service name as local part of a qname (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service Description Telcon])) (Saturday, 29 June)
• service name as local part of a qname (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: proposal for resolving service type issues (Tuesday, 11 June)

Swearingen Sandra Civ AFCA/ITCM

• RE: Reminder: WS Desc telcon Thursday 6 June 2002 (Wednesday, 5 June)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: Target namespace in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Rationale to close the operation overloading issue (Friday, 21 June)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 15:05:21 UTC