W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

RE: issue: service type

From: Matt Long <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:31:52 -0500
To: "'WS-Desc WG \(Public\)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c20c06$e3a9fa60$3cfff6d0@gulag>

What issues(s) do multi-service WSDLs present?


-Matt Long
Phalanx Systems, LLC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:47 PM
> To: WS-Desc WG (Public)
> Subject: Fw: issue: service type
> 
> 
> I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion
> that I can recall. Is this issue so boring??
> 
> Also related is the following:
>     <issue id="issue-multiple-services">
>       <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head>
>       WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL
>       file. This has caused confusion amongst users.
>       <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
>     </issue>
> 
> Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-)
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM
> Subject: issue: service type
> 
> 
> > I would like to open discussion on the following issue:
> >
> > <issue id="issue-service-type">
> >   <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head>
> >   WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no
> >   abstract analog.
> >   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> > </issue>
> >
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 16:42:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT