W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

proposal for resolving service type issues

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 00:16:31 +0600
Message-ID: <089e01c20f18$9fdb8230$02aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I promised during the telecon on Thu to send out a proposal
for resolving these issues. My apologies for the delay-
attached please find a short proposal for introducing
the concept of a <serviceType> as a first-class WSDL concept.

Off to Paris in 3 hrs (and hopefully to sleep before that!!).

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:47 AM
Subject: Fw: issue: service type


> 
> I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion 
> that I can recall. Is this issue so boring??
> 
> Also related is the following:
>     <issue id="issue-multiple-services">
>       <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head>
>       WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL
>       file. This has caused confusion amongst users.
>       <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
>     </issue>
> 
> Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-)
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM
> Subject: issue: service type
> 
> 
> > I would like to open discussion on the following issue:
> > 
> > <issue id="issue-service-type">
> >   <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head>
> >   WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no
> >   abstract analog. 
> >   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> > </issue>
> > 
> > 
> > Sanjiva.
> >


Received on Saturday, 8 June 2002 14:17:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT