W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: New issue: Representing safe operations (was: [TAG] how to use GET to make resources addressable)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:48:43 +0600
Message-ID: <09d401c20c00$d689e5d0$0aaa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Can we wait until they explicitly raise it against us or do
we need to preempt that?

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:56 PM
Subject: New issue: Representing safe operations (was: [TAG] how to use GET
to make resources addressable)


> I think the TAG has implicitely raised the following issue:
>
> <quote href="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7">
> WSDL 1.1 provides a binding to HTTP GET, which makes it possible
> to respect the principle of using GET for safe operations, but to
> more straightforwardly represent safety, it should be a property
> of operations themselves, not just a feature of bindings.
> </quote>
>
> Sanjiva, it looks like this is a Part 1 issue.
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 15:49:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT