W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:14:52 +0200
Message-ID: <3D11F16C.704C298B@crf.canon.fr>
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
CC: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

+1

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> I would like to close the following issue as its redundant:
>
>   <issue>
>     <issue-num>57</issue-num>
>     <title>Should Operations permit alternate and multiple
> responses?</title>
>     <locus>Spec</locus>
>     <requirement>n/a</requirement>
>     <priority>Design</priority>
>     <topic></topic>
>     <status>Active</status>
>     <originator><a href="mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com">Prasad
> Yendluri</a></originator>
>     <responsible>Unassigned</responsible>
>     <description>
>     [<a
>
> href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0081.html">ema
> il</a>]
>     We discussed this briefly at the F2F (perhaps) but, I think it
>     would be extremely helpful to permit alternate and multiple
>     responses to a request. That is permit multiple output messages in
>     an operation like we have multiple faults in an operation. It
>     would then be helpful to make them alternate or sequence. That is,
>     do all of them come back or just one of them. This is perhaps a
>     suggestion for new functionality.
>     </description>
>     <proposal>
>     </proposal>
>     <resolution>
>     </resolution>
>   </issue>
>
> The following closed issue makes the above redundant:
>
> <issue id="issue-operation-patterns" status="closed">
>   <head>Should more operation patterns be supported?</head>
>   We discussed this briefly at the April F2F (perhaps) but, I think
>   it would be extremely helpful to permit alternate and multiple
>   responses to a request. That is permit multiple output messages in
>   an operation like we have multiple faults in an operation. It would
>   then be helpful to make them alternate or sequence. That is, do all
>   of them come back or just one of them.
>   <source>Prasad Yendluri</source>
>   <resolution>This issue is closed by leaving it to the realm of
>   orchestration languages and applications. June 11, 2002 (at
>   face-to-face).</resolution>
> </issue>
>
> Any objections?
>
> Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 11:16:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT