W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?

From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:03:15 -0700
Message-ID: <3D18E8A3.C1BD9A2A@webmethods.com>
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
CC: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Yes we can close this one. Looks like two issues got opened from the same email
that I had originally sent out..

Regards, Prasad

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 07:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:34:14 +0600
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


I would like to close the following issue as its redundant:

  <issue>
    <issue-num>57</issue-num>
    <title>Should Operations permit alternate and multiple
responses?</title>
    <locus>Spec</locus>
    <requirement>n/a</requirement>
    <priority>Design</priority>
    <topic></topic>
    <status>Active</status>
    <originator><a href="mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com">Prasad
Yendluri</a></originator>
    <responsible>Unassigned</responsible>
    <description>
    [<a

href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0081.html">ema
il</a>]
    We discussed this briefly at the F2F (perhaps) but, I think it
    would be extremely helpful to permit alternate and multiple
    responses to a request. That is permit multiple output messages in
    an operation like we have multiple faults in an operation. It
    would then be helpful to make them alternate or sequence. That is,
    do all of them come back or just one of them. This is perhaps a
    suggestion for new functionality.
    </description>
    <proposal>
    </proposal>
    <resolution>
    </resolution>
  </issue>

The following closed issue makes the above redundant:

<issue id="issue-operation-patterns" status="closed">
  <head>Should more operation patterns be supported?</head>
  We discussed this briefly at the April F2F (perhaps) but, I think
  it would be extremely helpful to permit alternate and multiple
  responses to a request. That is permit multiple output messages in
  an operation like we have multiple faults in an operation. It would
  then be helpful to make them alternate or sequence. That is, do all
  of them come back or just one of them.
  <source>Prasad Yendluri</source>
  <resolution>This issue is closed by leaving it to the realm of
  orchestration languages and applications. June 11, 2002 (at
  face-to-face).</resolution>
</issue>

Any objections?

Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 17:59:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT