W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

RE: issue: service type

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 10:34:53 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020606102800.00a8c188@localhost>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, Matt Long <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
Cc: "'WS-Desc WG (Public)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

That sounds like a HUGE problem.  It would be horrible if one couldn't 
identify the service just by a URI.

At 04:49 PM 6/5/2002 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote:

>  Matt, one of the issues is that you cannot just pass a URL as a
>pointer to a service, you need the service QName, too. And the
>QName by itself is not sufficient either because you may not know
>where a WSDL definition of that QName is located.
>
>                    Jacek Kopecky
>
>                    Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
>                    http://www.systinet.com/
>
>
>
>On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Matt Long wrote:
>
>  >
>  > What issues(s) do multi-service WSDLs present?
>  >
>  >
>  > -Matt Long
>  > Phalanx Systems, LLC
>  >
>  > > -----Original Message-----
>  > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
>  > On
>  > > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
>  > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:47 PM
>  > > To: WS-Desc WG (Public)
>  > > Subject: Fw: issue: service type
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion
>  > > that I can recall. Is this issue so boring??
>  > >
>  > > Also related is the following:
>  > >     <issue id="issue-multiple-services">
>  > >       <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head>
>  > >       WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL
>  > >       file. This has caused confusion amongst users.
>  > >       <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
>  > >     </issue>
>  > >
>  > > Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-)
>  > >
>  > > Sanjiva.
>  > >
>  > > ----- Original Message -----
>  > > From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
>  > > To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
>  > > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM
>  > > Subject: issue: service type
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > > I would like to open discussion on the following issue:
>  > > >
>  > > > <issue id="issue-service-type">
>  > > >   <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head>
>  > > >   WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no
>  > > >   abstract analog.
>  > > >   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
>  > > > </issue>
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > Sanjiva.
>  > > >
>  >
>  >

-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 10:33:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT