>A more accurate way to state my understanding is that the >issue-operation-overloading is closed by removing the feature, and a new >issue has arisen: >issue-transition-documentation: Do we need to provide user >documentation describing the transition between WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 1.2? >If so, what form should such documentation take? The removal of >operation overloading and advice on how to restructure a WSDL 1.1 file >that relies on this feature are an example. Given this is user documentation, I would recommend that the transition document take the form (and tone) of a primer. ++++++++ Steve Graham sggraham@us.ibm.com (919)254-0615 (T/L 444) Emerging Technologies ++++++++Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 07:09:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT