W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

RE: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:12:20 -0700
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E0145D0DC@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Well, I think it sould probably just be 'role', as it appears on a
soap:header element there is no need to qualify the attribute.

Gudge

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:25
To: Martin Gudgin
Cc: Web Service Description
Subject: Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute


This is much better, thanks. Actually, I think we should also change
'SOAP role' to 'soap:role'.

Jean-Jacques.

Martin Gudgin wrote:

> Also suggest you merge the following two sentences;
>
> 'Omitting the SOAP role attribute information item is equivalent to 
> indicating value of 
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver".
> An empty value is equivalent to omitting the attribute completely, 
> i.e. targeting the SOAP header block to an ultimate SOAP receiver.'
>
> To read
>
> 'A SOAP role attribute information item that is either absent or has 
> an empty value is equivalent to indicating a value of 
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver" i.e. 
> targeting the SOAP header block to an ultimate SOAP receiver.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 12:12:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT