W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: proposal for resolving service type issues

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:47:00 +0200
Message-ID: <3D08B064.E63DEC0B@crf.canon.fr>
To: sggraham@us.ibm.com
CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Sounds good to me.

Jean-Jacques.

sggraham@us.ibm.com wrote:

> One way around this is to make the implements element a child
> of the service.
>
>   "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
> > That type is indicated by inserting the following required
> declaration:
> >
> > <implements serviceType="qname"/>
>
> ... however I don't think we can require the wsdl:implement
> element to be always present. For example, the WSDL file may
> only
> contain an abstract service declaration, which is refined and
> implemented in a second WSDL file. I think wsld:implement
> should
> be optional unless there is a concrete service definition (i.e.
>
> binding), in which case it should be mandatory.
>
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2002 10:47:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT