W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Agenda for 27 June 2002 WS Description WG

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:46:30 -0700
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59C06A0823E@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Dial in information (members only):
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jun/0049.html

See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. 

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
      Mario Jeckle (fallback Mike McHugh, Don Mullen, Jochen Ruetschlin,
Waqar Sadiq, Adi Sakala)

2.  Approval of minutes.
2a. 20 June telcon [6].
2b. Minutes from FTF - allow one more week for review.
    See [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].

3.  Review of Action items.
DONE 2002-06-20: JM. Converging issues list for single view
DONE 2002-06-20: JJM. add to issues list - specifying soap bindings 
                 fault codes
     2002-06-20: Sanjiva. Champion for 6c. Issue: SOAPAction1 #1
     2002-06-20: Jean-J. Analyze whether WSD should gneralize a
mechanism 
                 to provide protocol headers. This was discussed as part

                 of 6d. Issue: SOAPAction2 #2
DONE 2002-06-20: Gudge. Champion for 6e: Issue Namespaces #4
DONE 2002-06-20: Arthur: Champion for 6f. Issue: Encoding Style #5
DONE 2002-06-20: Jean-J Champion for 6g. Issue: nowhere to specify 
                 actor URI in WSDL? #17
     2002-06-20: JeffS Champion for 6h. Issue: Default for transport 
                 of <soap:binding> #18
     2002-06-20: Jean-J, Glen, Mike, Dietmar create TF. 3 weeks for 
                 findings on 6i. Issue: SOAP 1.2 support? #23 
     2002-06-20: JonathanM will help with telecon logictics for 6i. 
                 Issue: SOAP 1.2 support? #23 
     2002-06-20: JonathanM. Postpone 6j. Issue: Real difference 
                 between literal vs. encoded? #24
DONE 2002-06-20: Gudge. Champion for 6k. Issue: Unclear relationship 
                 between XML Schemas and SOAP data model #25
DONE 2002-06-20: Arthur. Champion for 6o. Issue: soap:body encodingStyle
                 #30.
     2002-06-20: Issue Editor. Jean-J identifies dup issue: 6q. Issue: 
                 SOAP 1.1 backward compatibility support? #32

4.  SOAP TF meeting - Monday 8AM PDT?

5.  Representation change: Cisco.

6.  Requirements document:
    Seeking approval to publish. [13]
    New draft requirements at [19] 

7.  WSDL 1.2 (parts 1 [14] and 2 [15])
    Seeking approval to publish on June 30 (?) barring any showstoppers.
    AM note at [20]

8.  Duplicate/redundant issues identified by Sanjiva.  Call for
objections at [38].
    No controversy:
    - Issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple 
                responses? [22]
    - Issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of 
                "definitions"? [23]
    - Issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go 
                where [24]
    - Issue 37: Should we remove parameter order? [25]
    - Issue 36: Should we remove notification operations? [26]
    - Issue 35: Should we remove solicit-response operations? [26]
    - Issue 34: Should portTypes be extensible? [27]
    - Issue "issue-clarify elements" [29]
    - Issue 42: Shall "element" attribute of "part" only refer to 
                elements defined in schema? [30]

    Some discussion:
    - Issue 26: Transmission primitives [28], [31]
    - Issue 60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional 
                parts [21], [40]

9.  New Issues
    - Issue: Clarification of the meaning of soap:operation/@style [16]
    - Issue: SOAP binding violates separation of abstract definitions
           and concrete bindings [37]
    - Issue: Ports, Names, Symbol Spaces and targetNamespace [43]

10. Editorial Issues
    Proposal: Delegate responsibility to editors for all issues marked
as "Editorial" in the issues list [42].  WG members would have 2 weeks
to review this list and verify that no issues marked "Editorial" have
substantive content that needs to be discussed.

11. Issue: Overloading operations.
    Joyce's rationale: [17]
    Vote:
    - Remove overloaded operations
    - Keep overloaded operations 

12. Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute.
    JJM's proposal thread starts at [32].

13. Issue issue-require-targetnamespace:
    Gudge's proposal thread starts at [33].

14. Issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>
    Sanjiva's proposal to remove this attribute [34].

15. Issue 4: Namespaces
    Gudge's proposal [35], musings at [39]

16. Issue issue-multiple-services.
    Sanjiva's proposal at [44].
 
17. Issue 5: EncodingStyle.
    Arthur recommends closing as a dupe of Issue #30. [41]

18. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model 
    Gudge's explains at [36]

19. Issue 30: soap:body encodingStyle
    Arthur's proposal [41]

20. Issue service-type:  [46] OK to wait on Abstract Component work to
provide a more concrete proposal?

21. Issue remove-solicit-response-operations: Removing solicit-response
and notifications.  [45] OK to schedule for FTF?

22. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
    Jeffrey recommends no change [18].

- Jonathan

--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0170.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0057.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0056.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0081.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0069.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0064.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0208.html
[13]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/requirements/ws-desc-re
qs.html
[14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/part1/part1.html
[15]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/part2/wsdl12-part2.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0110.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0080.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0164.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0166.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0111.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0112.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0113.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0114.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0115.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0116.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0117.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0118.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0120.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0121.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0137.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0190.html
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0167.html
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0175.html
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0168.html
[36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html
[37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0187.html
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0144.html
[39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0191.html
[40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0182.html
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html
[42] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0165.html
[44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0046.html
[45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0109.html
[46] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0002.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 16:47:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT