W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: proposal for resolving service type issues

From: Steve Tuecke <tuecke@mcs.anl.gov>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 03:15:16 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020611031013.00b1f5d0@localhost>
To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

At 01:48 PM 6/10/2002, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > > That type is indicated by inserting the following required
> > declaration:
> > >
> > >      <implements serviceType="qname"/>
> >
> > ... however I don't think we can require the wsdl:implement
> > element to be always present. For example, the WSDL file may only
> > contain an abstract service declaration, which is refined and
> > implemented in a second WSDL file. I think wsld:implement should
> > be optional unless there is a concrete service definition (i.e.
> > binding), in which case it should be mandatory.
>
>Oh yes, good point!

Might this be resolved by moving the wsdl:implements element to live within 
the wsdl:service element, instead of within the wsdl:description element, 
and make wsdl:implements required for all wsdl:service elements?

-Steve
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 04:16:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT