W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: issue: service type

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 20:55:30 +0600
Message-ID: <03de01c20d6a$38ca1f20$02aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "'WS-Desc WG \(Public\)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Isn't there a TAG issue on how to map a QName to a URI? The
resolution of that would solve this.

What's the problem?

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>; "Matt Long" <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
Cc: "'WS-Desc WG (Public)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: RE: issue: service type


>
> That sounds like a HUGE problem.  It would be horrible if one couldn't
> identify the service just by a URI.
>
> At 04:49 PM 6/5/2002 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
>
> >  Matt, one of the issues is that you cannot just pass a URL as a
> >pointer to a service, you need the service QName, too. And the
> >QName by itself is not sufficient either because you may not know
> >where a WSDL definition of that QName is located.
> >
> >                    Jacek Kopecky
> >
> >                    Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
> >                    http://www.systinet.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Matt Long wrote:
> >
> >  >
> >  > What issues(s) do multi-service WSDLs present?
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > -Matt Long
> >  > Phalanx Systems, LLC
> >  >
> >  > > -----Original Message-----
> >  > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> >  > On
> >  > > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> >  > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:47 PM
> >  > > To: WS-Desc WG (Public)
> >  > > Subject: Fw: issue: service type
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion
> >  > > that I can recall. Is this issue so boring??
> >  > >
> >  > > Also related is the following:
> >  > >     <issue id="issue-multiple-services">
> >  > >       <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one
service?</head>
> >  > >       WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL
> >  > >       file. This has caused confusion amongst users.
> >  > >       <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> >  > >     </issue>
> >  > >
> >  > > Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-)
> >  > >
> >  > > Sanjiva.
> >  > >
> >  > > ----- Original Message -----
> >  > > From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> >  > > To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> >  > > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM
> >  > > Subject: issue: service type
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > > I would like to open discussion on the following issue:
> >  > > >
> >  > > > <issue id="issue-service-type">
> >  > > >   <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head>
> >  > > >   WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is
no
> >  > > >   abstract analog.
> >  > > >   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> >  > > > </issue>
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Sanjiva.
> >  > > >
> >  >
> >  >
>
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 10:56:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT