www-webont-wg@w3.org from May 2002 by author

Bernard Horan

Re: Ann: Web Services Architecture Requirements published (fwd) (Thursday, 2 May)

Brian McBride

Re: syntactic restrictions on RDF graphs (Thursday, 2 May)

Christopher Welty

Re: More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL (Monday, 27 May)
Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Tuesday, 21 May)
Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Tuesday, 21 May)
Re: Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Monday, 20 May)
Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Wednesday, 15 May)
On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Tuesday, 14 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Tuesday, 14 May)
Re: WOWG: compliance levels on next teleconf (Thursday, 2 May)

connolly@jammer.dm93.org

layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)

Dan Brickley

Re: ISSUE NOT OPEN (was Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding) (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Thursday, 23 May)
New RDF Core Working Drafts published (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: WOWG: compliance levels on next teleconf (Wednesday, 1 May)

Dan Connolly

pls fill out registration form by 21Jun, even to offer regrets (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: OPEN Issue 2.5 - Closed Sets (daml:List, daml:Collection) (Thursday, 30 May)
layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: archive copies [was: AGENDA: May 30 telecon] (Wednesday, 29 May)
archive copies [was: AGENDA: May 30 telecon] (Wednesday, 29 May)
DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Wednesday, 29 May)
4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies (Tuesday, 28 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (property vs. relation) (Friday, 24 May)
pls register for WebOnt ftf3, 1-2 Jun in Stanford (Friday, 24 May)
Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: ADMIN: pointers to useful WebOnt information from the WebOnt home page (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: ISSUE: Datatypes (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: SEM: OWL issues affecting OWL semantics (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Wednesday, 15 May)
Re: DTTF: Chair's request (Friday, 3 May)
2 May WebOnt telcon minutes for review [was: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda] (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: number range expressions (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: syntactic restrictions on RDF graphs (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: ADMIN: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda, May 2 (Thursday, 2 May)
GUIDE: UML presentation syntax reviews? [was: Telecon Agenda, May 2] (Thursday, 2 May)

David Trastour

Re: An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: May 23rd telecon regrets (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: LANG: number range expressions (Thursday, 2 May)

Deborah McGuinness

update to the compliance document (Sunday, 26 May)
minutes of EU/US Joint committee (Sunday, 26 May)
iswc meeting proposal on webont language documents (Friday, 24 May)
regrets for may 28, june 4, question on june 11 (Thursday, 23 May)
Issue: compliance level 1 position with respect to rdf (Thursday, 23 May)
Issue: Feature decision for compliance level 1: cardinality restrictions (Thursday, 23 May)
Issue: Feature decision for compliance level 1: local range restrictions (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Wednesday, 15 May)
Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Tuesday, 14 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (VOTE on local range restrictions) (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Wednesday, 1 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (VOTE on local range restrictions) (Wednesday, 1 May)
Re: WOWG: compliance levels on next teleconf (Wednesday, 1 May)
Re: WOWG: compliance levels on next teleconf (Wednesday, 1 May)

Enrico Motta

Regrets for 5/30 (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: update to the compliance document (Wednesday, 29 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Wednesday, 1 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Wednesday, 1 May)

Evan Wallace

Re: 4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies (Wednesday, 29 May)
Re: archive copies [was: AGENDA: May 30 telecon] (Wednesday, 29 May)
More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL (Tuesday, 21 May)

Frank van Harmelen

Re: AGENDA (update): May 30 telecon (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL (Friday, 24 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)

Guus Schreiber

AGENDA (update): May 30 telecon (Thursday, 30 May)
An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Thursday, 30 May)
4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies] (Thursday, 30 May)
AGENDA: May 30 telecon (Wednesday, 29 May)
ISSUES: 4.5, 5..11, 4.6 opened (Monday, 27 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Monday, 27 May)
Re: More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: AGENDA: May 16 telecon (Wednesday, 15 May)
AGENDA: May 16 telecon (Wednesday, 15 May)

herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Re: LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft) (Friday, 31 May)

Ian Horrocks

Re: regrets for may 28, june 4, question on june 11 (Friday, 24 May)
Re: Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Thursday, 16 May)
Semantic Web article in today's Financial Times (Monday, 6 May)
Re: LANG: number range expressions (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (sameState TEST) (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (sameState TEST) (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: WOWG: compliance levels on next teleconf (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (VOTE on local range restrictions) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Jeff Heflin

5.11 hasClass/toClass names (Friday, 31 May)
Re: An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Friday, 31 May)
Re: update to the compliance document (Friday, 31 May)
Re: update to the compliance document (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Wednesday, 29 May)
Re: LANG: new version of 2nd face-to-face full language document (Wednesday, 29 May)
4.6 EquivalentTo issue (Wednesday, 29 May)
ISSUE: Ontology versioning (Wednesday, 22 May)
Regrets for 5/16 (Wednesday, 15 May)
ISSUE: daml:imports as magic syntax (Friday, 10 May)

Jeremy Carroll

RE: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Friday, 31 May)
RE: DTTF: darkest africa (Friday, 31 May)
RE: DTTF: darkest africa (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
DTTF: darkest africa (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Wednesday, 29 May)
Regrets July f2f (Wednesday, 29 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Friday, 24 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Thursday, 23 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Wednesday, 22 May)
DTTF: Embracing the dark side (Tuesday, 14 May)
DTTF: comprehension (Friday, 3 May)
DTTF: another summary (Friday, 3 May)
RE: DTTF: high-level summary (attempt) (Thursday, 2 May)
ISSUE: List syntax or semantics (Thursday, 2 May)
RE: DTTF: List Ontology test case (Thursday, 2 May)

Jim Hendler

Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names (Friday, 31 May)
Re: Dark triples are not inherently nonmonotonic (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: RDF Schema document review (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: update to the compliance document (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances (Thursday, 30 May)
Proposal that Issue 3.3 (Daml:DisjointFrom) be eradicated from the issues list (Thursday, 30 May)
Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (Thursday, 30 May)
Issue 3.1 - Local Restrictions (Thursday, 30 May)
OPEN Issue 2.5 - Closed Sets (daml:List, daml:Collection) (Thursday, 30 May)
Issue 2.4 - Enumerated Classes (daml:oneOf) (Thursday, 30 May)
Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances (Thursday, 30 May)
Issue 2.1: URI naming of Instances (Wednesday, 29 May)
WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4 (Wednesday, 29 May)
RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Wednesday, 29 May)
Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Friday, 24 May)
ISSUE NOT OPEN (was Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding) (Thursday, 23 May)
ADMIN: Agenda for May 23rd Telecon (Wednesday, 22 May)
RE: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Monday, 20 May)
ISSUE: hasClass/toClass (Monday, 20 May)
ADMIN: Log of May 16 WEBONT Telecon (Sunday, 19 May)
RE: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Sunday, 19 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Thursday, 16 May)
WOWG: Ontology awareness increasing (Thursday, 16 May)
Chairs and webont email problems (Wednesday, 15 May)
LANG/GUIDE: Thought on compliance levels and WG goals (Sem/test please read too) (Sunday, 12 May)
WOWG: Presentation at WWW 2002 on Web Ont WG (Saturday, 11 May)
Re: DTTF: Chair's request (Friday, 3 May)
DTTF: Chair's request (Friday, 3 May)
Re: LANG: number range expressions (Thursday, 2 May)
ADMIN Telecon agenda update (was Re: New RDF Core Working Drafts published) (Thursday, 2 May)
Lang Compliance and Tomorrow's telecon (Thursday, 2 May)
ADMIN: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda, May 2 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Jonathan Borden

Re: Dark triples are not inherently nonmonotonic (Thursday, 30 May)
Dark triples are not inherently nonmonotonic (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Thursday, 30 May)
DTTF: summary (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Tuesday, 28 May)
DTTF: summary 5/27/2002 for review (Tuesday, 28 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Monday, 27 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Wednesday, 22 May)
Why paradoxes would render OWL useless (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Wednesday, 22 May)
DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Wednesday, 22 May)
DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Wednesday, 22 May)
DTTF: Can 'semantically closed' languages be extended? (Friday, 10 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
FYI: WebOnt on xml.com (Saturday, 4 May)
Re: Chair's request (Friday, 3 May)
Re: comprehension (Friday, 3 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Wednesday, 1 May)
Re: ADMIN: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda, May 2 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Jonathan Dale

Regrets for 16-May (Monday, 13 May)

Jos De_Roo

RDFCORE: construct for closed lists (Friday, 31 May)
DTTF: Re: AGENDA (update): May 30 telecon (Thursday, 30 May)
TEST: sameClassAs testcase (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: 4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Friday, 24 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Friday, 24 May)
Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Friday, 24 May)
Re: A derivation of a contradiction from the Russell set (was Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak) (Tuesday, 21 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
ISSUE: Entailing inconsistencies (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Saturday, 18 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Friday, 17 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Friday, 17 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Tuesday, 14 May)
Re: DTTF: Can 'semantically closed' languages be extended? (Sunday, 12 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Tuesday, 7 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Sunday, 5 May)
Re: circular paradox gizmo (Friday, 3 May)
Re: circular paradox gizmo (Friday, 3 May)
Re: DTTF: comprehension (Friday, 3 May)
circular paradox gizmo (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: LANG: compliance levels (Thursday, 2 May)

larry.eshelman@philips.com

Regrets (Friday, 10 May)

Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston)

Regrets - May 2 telecon (Thursday, 2 May)

Leo Obrst

regrets for 5/16 telecon (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Tuesday, 14 May)
Re: ISSUE: daml:imports as magic syntax (Saturday, 11 May)

Libby Miller

May 23rd telecon regrets (Wednesday, 22 May)
regrets 16th May telecon (Tuesday, 14 May)

Lynn Andrea Stein

Regrets for 6/6, 6/13 (Thursday, 30 May)

Massimo Marchiori

WARNING: W3C Scheduled Power Outage 31 May - 1 June (Wednesday, 29 May)
DTTF: high-level summary (attempt) (Thursday, 2 May)

Mike Dean

Re: Proposal that Issue 3.3 (Daml:DisjointFrom) be eradicated from the issues list (Thursday, 30 May)
regrets for 5/30 (Wednesday, 29 May)
Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Thursday, 16 May)

Nick Gibbins

Re: RDF Schema document review (Friday, 31 May)
Regrets for 2002-05-30 telecon (Wednesday, 29 May)
MISC: Response to RDF Core re: RDF Schema (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: ISSUE: Datatypes (Thursday, 16 May)

pat hayes

Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Thursday, 23 May)

patrick hayes

Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Sunday, 19 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Sunday, 19 May)
Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL (Sunday, 19 May)
Re: ISSUE: Datatypes (Sunday, 19 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

RE: DTTF: darkest africa (Friday, 31 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Thursday, 30 May)
ISSUE: XML presentation syntax (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Thursday, 30 May)
RDF Schema document review (Thursday, 30 May)
LANG: official version of full language features document (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: DTTF: darkest africa (Thursday, 30 May)
Re: DTTF: darkest africa (Thursday, 30 May)
RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Wednesday, 29 May)
Re: AGENDA: May 30 telecon (Wednesday, 29 May)
RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10) (Wednesday, 29 May)
An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL (Tuesday, 28 May)
Re: iswc meeting proposal on webont language documents (Tuesday, 28 May)
Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Tuesday, 28 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Friday, 24 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Friday, 24 May)
23 May WebOnt teleconference minutes for review (Thursday, 23 May)
Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Thursday, 23 May)
RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!) (Wednesday, 22 May)
LANG: new version of 2nd face-to-face full language document (Wednesday, 22 May)
ADMIN: pointers to useful WebOnt information from the WebOnt home page (Wednesday, 22 May)
MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding (Wednesday, 22 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Tuesday, 21 May)
A derivation of a contradiction from the Russell set (was Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak) (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Monday, 20 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Sunday, 19 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Saturday, 18 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Friday, 17 May)
Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: ISSUE: Datatypes (Thursday, 16 May)
SEM: OWL issues affecting OWL semantics (Thursday, 16 May)
ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak (Thursday, 16 May)
ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Thursday, 16 May)
ISSUE: Datatypes (Thursday, 16 May)
Re: a problem with comprehensive entailments (Monday, 6 May)
Re: DTTF: comprehension (Friday, 3 May)
Re: circular paradox gizmo (Friday, 3 May)
Re: DTTF: another summary (Friday, 3 May)
a problem with comprehensive entailments (Friday, 3 May)
Re: circular paradox gizmo (Thursday, 2 May)
Re: DTTF: high-level summary (attempt) (Thursday, 2 May)
syntactic restrictions on RDF graphs (Thursday, 2 May)
RE: DTTF: List Ontology test case (Thursday, 2 May)

R.V.Guha

Dark triples are inherently nonmonotonic (from Pat Hayes & R.Guha) (Thursday, 30 May)

Raphael Volz

AW: RDFS review (was re: LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft)) (Friday, 31 May)
LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft) (Thursday, 30 May)

ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com

AID'02 Workshop (Monday, 27 May)

Smith, Michael K

ADMIN: Telecon regrets May 30, June 6 (Thursday, 23 May)
RE: ADMIN: pointers to useful WebOnt information from the WebOnt home page (Wednesday, 22 May)
RE: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Monday, 20 May)
RE: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions (Friday, 17 May)
RE: Compliance Level 1 Proposal (Thursday, 16 May)
RE: DTTF: another summary (Tuesday, 7 May)

Stanton, John

Stanton - Regrets - May 2 Teleconference (Thursday, 2 May)
Stanton - Regrets Telecom May 2 (Thursday, 2 May)

Thompson, Lynne R

5/23 Belated Regrets (Thursday, 23 May)
RE: Chairs and webont email problems (Thursday, 16 May)
Regrets (Thursday, 2 May)

tim finin

Regrets for 5/16 (Tuesday, 14 May)

York Sure

3rd Call for Papers: EON2002 (Friday, 31 May)

Ziv Hellman

RE: DTTF: How unasserted triples help (Monday, 27 May)
ISSUE: range restrictions should not be separate URIs (Sunday, 5 May)
regrets for a few weeks (Thursday, 2 May)
LANG: number range expressions (Thursday, 2 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2002 17:44:49 UTC