Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal

> I made a small update to the compliance level 1 document that reflects
> input
> from connolly on primitive class, the general terminology issue around
> primitive vs. defined classes, welty on the use of relation,
> horrocks for references for the issue concerning the limitation of not
> allowing transitive properties or their superproperties to be functional,
> same url contains the update (and points to the original document as
> well).
>
> if you read it before you dont need to reread - I am just letting you
know
> that an update was done.

maybe a motivating testcase is missing from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0097.html
something like
( <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/sameGuyP.n3>
  <http://www.w3.org/2001/10/daml+oil#> )
  |=
  <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/sameGuyC.n3> .

--
Jos