W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal

From: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:38:42 -0700
Message-ID: <3CE2B942.6E45F739@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
sorry - that was my mistake.  I left in the notion of primitive (as
distinguished from defined classes).
I will modify the compliance level spec to read just class where
primitiveClass was mentioned.

It is consistent with our notion of class in daml+oil (of course only
using the features of the compliance level 1 language).
so it contains 0 or more subClassOf elements   and 0 or more sameClassAs
elements

deborah
Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 00:14, Deborah McGuinness wrote:
> > At the last telecon, I took the action item to produce a compliance
> > level 1 document by today.
> > The document is available at:
> > http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/compliance.html
>   lst modified: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:15:40 GMT
>
> "The expanded summary listing of this proposal includes:
>
> * RDF Schema features
>   primitiveclass"
>
> I don't understand what "primitiveclass" refers to in
> the context of RDFS. Please explain.
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

--
 Deborah L. McGuinness
 Knowledge Systems Laboratory
 Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241
 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020
 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
 URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm
 (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)
801 705 0941
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 16:11:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:50 GMT