- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 14:00:48 +0200
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: ""Jonathan Borden" <jonathan" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "\"\"Peter F. Patel-Schneider\" <pfps\"" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "<www-webont-wg" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
[...] > In particular the following implication that is valid under RDFS will > not hold under OWL. > > eg:prop rdfs:subClassOf owl:Restriction . > _:x rdf:type eg:prop . > > entails > > _:x rdf:type owl:Restriction . let's decide on this one for me this entailment is OK under OWL (as well as under RDFS) -- Jos
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 08:01:40 UTC