> I think inverseOf is quite useful for mapping > between ontologies; here's > an example of how I understand it to work: > > premise: > > :joe my:hasBrother :bob. > > my:hasBrother ont:inverseOf your:isBrotherOf. > > conclusion: > > > :bob your:isBrotherOf :joe. > > full details, with namespaces and all that: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/mapInvP.rdf > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/mapInvC.rdf we can indeed assert the statement ( <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/mapInvP.n3> <http://www.w3.org/2001/10/daml+oil#> ) log:entails <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/mapInvC.n3> . > (for the cwm/N3-minded, see the mapInvR.n3 stanza > the http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/Makefile for > one way to run this test.) Dan, I'm not sure what to do with all those "'s in mapInvR.n3 such as rdf:"type and rdf:"Property -- JosReceived on Thursday, 30 May 2002 05:14:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:30 GMT