AW: RDFS review (was re: LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft))

Hi -

I am missing a sentence on the ambiguity of rdfs:isDefinedBy
(it's already an issue in RDF Core see
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics).

Otherwise I am comfortable with the document as it stands.

Best regards,


RAphael


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jim Hendler [mailto:hendler@cs.umd.edu]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 13:29
An: volz@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
Cc: Guus Schreiber
Betreff: RDFS review (was re: LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft))


>
>
>- Comments webont on RDF Schema document by Gibbins
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0178.html
>Two reviewers needed.
--> reviewers: pps, raphael volz, hendler

Raphael - Peter and I have both said it is okay, soon as we hear from
you we can move on this - thanks JH
--
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler