RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!)

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:53:54 -0400
• To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Cc: jonathan@openhealth.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20020522125354S.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:02:43 +0100

> On any vote concerning this summary, I would formally abstain.
> This is merely because I see the preamble (i.e. most of the message) as
> overstating the case.

Could you describe where and why you think that the preample is overstating
the case? 

> But I acknowledge that there is *a* case and so support the conclusion.
> 
> Jeremy

peter

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:55:22 UTC