> > It seems to me that if we substitute "CE" for "PE" in, for example, Nagel's > "Godel's Proof" -- which is a relatively nontechnical read, then "CE" may > indeed be stuck with the same essential problem as "PM". > That should be: "It seems to me that if we substitute "CE" for "PM" ..."Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 19:28:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:50 GMT